Keep On Moving
Jan. 31st, 2006 03:20 pmTwo things said by the Lex on the Poptimists chart thread:
"Gareth and I were talking last night about how a lot of the pro-pop people appear to have collectively decided that pop is a sonic genre rather than...anything and everything which cannibalises anything and everything else with an eye on the charts and sonic results all over the map, which is how I would want to define and approve of pop."
"I think my view of pop is the, the pure poppist view! the "pop-is-not-a-sound-but-an-ethos" argument which means that anything from Avril Lavigne to Stardust can be pop if it wants but that any attempt to define pop on strict sonic boundaries, or to make music based on these definitions (as many of these Swedes seem to do), is itself r*ck*sm or even worse INDIE"
Worth more discussion I reckons. Maybe we should ignore the whole qn of indie as I honestly think it's a side issue, and let's also try and leave rock1sm out of this until we know what it means, but yeah, is pop a sound or an ethos, or a sound that epitomises an ethos, or WHAT?
(If yr starving for actual YSI fun I will have some goodies for you tonight, including Bosh of the Week)
(Meanwhile for full on comments box madness scroll back to the Now 18 poll and look at the bottom - EEK)
"Gareth and I were talking last night about how a lot of the pro-pop people appear to have collectively decided that pop is a sonic genre rather than...anything and everything which cannibalises anything and everything else with an eye on the charts and sonic results all over the map, which is how I would want to define and approve of pop."
"I think my view of pop is the, the pure poppist view! the "pop-is-not-a-sound-but-an-ethos" argument which means that anything from Avril Lavigne to Stardust can be pop if it wants but that any attempt to define pop on strict sonic boundaries, or to make music based on these definitions (as many of these Swedes seem to do), is itself r*ck*sm or even worse INDIE"
Worth more discussion I reckons. Maybe we should ignore the whole qn of indie as I honestly think it's a side issue, and let's also try and leave rock1sm out of this until we know what it means, but yeah, is pop a sound or an ethos, or a sound that epitomises an ethos, or WHAT?
(If yr starving for actual YSI fun I will have some goodies for you tonight, including Bosh of the Week)
(Meanwhile for full on comments box madness scroll back to the Now 18 poll and look at the bottom - EEK)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 03:29 pm (UTC)Anyway:
One principle of "poptimism" - for me anyway: The commercial success of music is nearly always interesting, whether or not the music itself is any good or you might phrase it Successful music may or may not be good, but it's rarely easily dismissed. Obviously people dismiss it all the time, but by this I mean that they are lunkheads.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 03:33 pm (UTC)(i think this is a better thread as it's more general and less these-bloody-swedes)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 03:33 pm (UTC)Pop that makes one feel miserable is either goth or soul (depending on how good the song is).
Indie = made for the artist to enjoy and b8ll8cks to anyone who doesn't.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 03:36 pm (UTC)(ps i think this is true)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 03:42 pm (UTC)But surely something is also pop - or at least takes on some of the magic or characteristics of pop - when its success takes place in a smaller community, a pocket universe like ILM or East London or Poptimism or whatever. So maybe the characteristics of pop are its ability to induce rushes of enthusiasm, excitement, to override 'considered' response?
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 03:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 03:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 03:54 pm (UTC)But presumably nobody really agrees with this do they?
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 03:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Arab Strap
From:no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 04:06 pm (UTC)"What counts as pop is left up to you, but it probably includes at least some stuff that gets in the charts."
The caveat is there only as a notice to put off people who are purely into power pop or whatever, Maybe I shouldn't try and put them off.
The 'up to you' think is because part of what I like about being 'into pop' is the possibility of being persuaded that something unlikely IS pop.
(This is because I use 'pop' as something interchangeable with 'what I value'. People's choice of value words - "it rocks", "it has soul", etc. is interesting.)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 04:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 04:07 pm (UTC)Sounds good to me... ;-)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 04:09 pm (UTC)Kraftwerk
The Pet Shop Boys
Alison Goldfrapp
Yello
Ron Mael
So it would seem an element of crankiness in Pop is key (for me)!
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 04:12 pm (UTC)Barp barp. Chk! Chk-cha-kaaaa!
dreary vocal monotone != cranky music.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 04:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 04:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 04:19 pm (UTC)I can see how this might be 'wrong', in that the technology/method is irrelevent wrt determining Indieness in terms of ethos.
But it's a habit I got into back when I was complaining about why Moloko or whoever were not more popular (before 'Sing It Back'!) and it's been hard to stop or even rethink.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 04:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 04:27 pm (UTC)Pop = stuff you like when you are P1SSED or otherwise WORSE 4 WEAR.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 04:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:& another question
Date: 2006-01-31 04:36 pm (UTC)Re: & another question
Date: 2006-01-31 04:40 pm (UTC)Re: & another question
From:Re: & another question
From:Re: & another question
From:Re: & another question
From:Re: & another question
From:Re: & another question
From:Re: & another question
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-01-31 05:42 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: & another question
From:no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 05:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 05:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 05:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 05:45 pm (UTC)He Who Believes That The Pazz & Jop Results Will Be Posted In Two Hours
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 05:46 pm (UTC)Panic! At the Disco
Juanita Bynum
Little Big Town
Ying Yang Twins
Too Short
He Who Bought Freaky Tales When It Was First Released
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 05:59 pm (UTC)differentiate you from your older brotherwin the particular argument you are currently engaged in.For the purposes of this particular argument I want to point out that girls used to scream for the Rolling Stones, and that the world's current best pop star (Ashlee Simpson) will sometimes employ vocal attacks derived ultimately from "Satisfaction" and "Positively 4th Street" and "Violet" etc. So whether as sound or ethos, I'm not sure you guys get it. (And Stones and Dylan and Courtney were surely drawing on all the popular culture they'd gorged on as children.) (But to be honest I should also point out that Ashlee isn't nearly as boffo at the box office as I'd like.)
He Who Believes That Pazz & Jop Is Now About An Hour And A Half Away
(And I Would Like To Point Out That I Am Indeed A Spam Robot So You Can Stop Asking, OK?)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 06:02 pm (UTC)Can you hum "Stardust"? "For the Good Times" (Ray Price, #1 country, #11 pop, USA, 1970)?
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 06:03 pm (UTC)He Who Takes Pleasure In Contradicting Others
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 06:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-01-31 06:12 pm (UTC) - Expandno subject
Date: 2006-01-31 06:23 pm (UTC)He Who Has Heard "Losing Grip" And "Unwanted" And "Addicted" And "Hear Me" (But I Am Not Going To Count Hilary Duff's "Fly" As Goth No Matter What Anyone On The Rolling Teenpop 2006 Thread Says)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 06:30 pm (UTC)I have Lacuna Coil on order, hopefully it will come soon.
(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-01-31 06:39 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-01-31 07:51 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-01-31 08:02 pm (UTC)Stan, Your Biggest Fan