What is the relationship between coolness and naffness in pop history.
A version of it wd describe pop history as essentially a story of a thread of coolness constantly besieged by naffness. This seems deeply unsatisfactory to me.
A version of it wd describe pop history as essentially a story of a thread of coolness constantly besieged by naffness. This seems deeply unsatisfactory to me.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 09:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 01:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 09:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 09:50 am (UTC)the dynamic of "cool" seems to be "it's good until a critical mass of applause is reached, then it becomes bad" -- ie "cool" has the same apparent qualities as NEW and DIFFERENT but less absolute; so that a non-tiny group of people can imbibe over time before the goodness goes
so can a better map be drawn up by pushing the claim out to an extreme?: "a thread of DIFFERENCE constantly besieged by SAMENESS" (i don't mean this is correct -- it isn't -- i mean, what's obviously absurd about this statement is also absurd in the cool-naff version, even though it's a less strong claim
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 09:56 am (UTC)i want to suggest other categories, though, and make it "non-binary" (sorry)
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 09:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 09:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 09:59 am (UTC)haha THAT REMINDS ME
Date: 2006-06-29 10:00 am (UTC)a tidily dressed dressed gentleman, black, grey-bearded, in his mid-60s and quiet in demeanour, wearing a felt bobblehat with a brim that stated it was a maltesers product, and fashioned in the shape of a CHRISTMAS PUDDING!!
Re: haha THAT REMINDS ME
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 09:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 10:02 am (UTC)please re-phrase that sentence using your age instead of the years innit.
hello tom, this is a nice thing to greet us with on yr return :)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 10:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 10:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 10:06 am (UTC)And welcome back!
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 10:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:stability surely unnecessary for meaning
From:haha LOOK!
From:Re: haha LOOK!
From:Re: haha LOOK!
From:Re: haha LOOK!
From:Re: haha LOOK!
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 10:13 am (UTC)Cool at the moment therefore is Ne-Yo!
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 10:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 10:14 am (UTC)but "cool" as originally used -- it was explored on that VICTORIA COREN prog -- meant sumfin a bit like "botherd", and didn't reference artists so much as those left unruffled by the rush of life
(in john miller chernoff's tremendous book on african drumming., he describes being in a club at a bar listening to african pop, and his toe is twitching to the music, and someone sees this and shouts with glee that this is the COOLEST DANCE EVER SEEN -- ie in west africa at the time, controlled elegant minimalism is a value
(re this anecdote: i can't remember if the word is actually "cool" though, or an african word meaning "cool")
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 10:34 am (UTC)= those full of smack?
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 10:37 am (UTC)Dunno, mate.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 10:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 10:45 am (UTC)my xmas-pudding bobblehat man = VERY cool in the sense of looks weird and argualby silly but carries it well (esp.on such a hot day)
does this become actually really cool if an arbiter imitates (cf "i'll have a babycham!")? NO! it is already cool -- the arbiter is merely acknowledging an extant fact
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 10:56 am (UTC)AND ANYWAY 'naff' might not be the opposite of 'cool', or the relationship between the two might not be symmetrical.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 10:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:Arbiters
Date: 2006-06-29 10:59 am (UTC)