What is the relationship between coolness and naffness in pop history.
A version of it wd describe pop history as essentially a story of a thread of coolness constantly besieged by naffness. This seems deeply unsatisfactory to me.
A version of it wd describe pop history as essentially a story of a thread of coolness constantly besieged by naffness. This seems deeply unsatisfactory to me.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 10:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 10:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 10:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 11:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 12:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 10:56 am (UTC)This is key, I think. 'where successful' possibly implies some recongition/identification by 'judgers' of coolness but without seeming to seek that?
cf the difference between 'cool' and 'trying too hard'?