What is the relationship between coolness and naffness in pop history.
A version of it wd describe pop history as essentially a story of a thread of coolness constantly besieged by naffness. This seems deeply unsatisfactory to me.
A version of it wd describe pop history as essentially a story of a thread of coolness constantly besieged by naffness. This seems deeply unsatisfactory to me.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 09:50 am (UTC)the dynamic of "cool" seems to be "it's good until a critical mass of applause is reached, then it becomes bad" -- ie "cool" has the same apparent qualities as NEW and DIFFERENT but less absolute; so that a non-tiny group of people can imbibe over time before the goodness goes
so can a better map be drawn up by pushing the claim out to an extreme?: "a thread of DIFFERENCE constantly besieged by SAMENESS" (i don't mean this is correct -- it isn't -- i mean, what's obviously absurd about this statement is also absurd in the cool-naff version, even though it's a less strong claim
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 09:56 am (UTC)i want to suggest other categories, though, and make it "non-binary" (sorry)
no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 09:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 09:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-29 09:59 am (UTC)haha THAT REMINDS ME
Date: 2006-06-29 10:00 am (UTC)a tidily dressed dressed gentleman, black, grey-bearded, in his mid-60s and quiet in demeanour, wearing a felt bobblehat with a brim that stated it was a maltesers product, and fashioned in the shape of a CHRISTMAS PUDDING!!
Re: haha THAT REMINDS ME
Date: 2006-06-29 10:01 am (UTC)