http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/musical/2007/10/22/071022crmu_music_frerejones
- I would imagine there'll be lots of blogtalk about this one. It feels to me like he's fighting old battles, or maybe telling old war stories that aren't quite as tightly relevant to now as they should be. But the point about the shift from imitator to fan seems an interesting one.
Meanwhile there's still a couple of hours to vote in the Pop Open.
- I would imagine there'll be lots of blogtalk about this one. It feels to me like he's fighting old battles, or maybe telling old war stories that aren't quite as tightly relevant to now as they should be. But the point about the shift from imitator to fan seems an interesting one.
Meanwhile there's still a couple of hours to vote in the Pop Open.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 09:44 am (UTC)But uh, just in terms of really popular indie-ish music -- what about Spoon, who he's written about twice this year? what about LCD Soundsystem? what about the Rapture? what about Belle & Sebastian and other twee type bands who appropriate a lot of old school R&B elements?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 09:51 am (UTC)Even that feels like an old argument though - what disappointed me about the piece is that I hoped he was going to be more specific about what's good and bad about what you might call post-Arcade-Fire indie (for a lot of which rhythm is really vital to get that rolling surging feel) but he doesn't grip on that at all, instead he complains about Wilco winning a poll FIVE YEARS AGO!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 10:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 10:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 10:41 am (UTC)...and don't say orange juice ;)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 10:48 am (UTC)Talking Heads. A Certain Ratio. Public Image Limited. The Slits. [posts jpeg of Reynolds book cover]
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 11:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 10:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 10:13 am (UTC)See: "Dirty Dream #2," "Women's Realm," "Funny Little Frog," "If She Wants Me," "Legal Man."
Fun fact: R&B existed before the 90s! Remember Motown and Stax? I think your people called it "Northern Soul."
no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 01:32 pm (UTC)I've heard of northern soul but it seems so fusty and old and irrelevant to me.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 10:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 10:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 10:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 01:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:MEROVINGIAN POP
From:Re: MEROVINGIAN POP
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 10:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 10:16 am (UTC)And what about music made by people who are neither black or white? Do they even count at all?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 10:55 am (UTC)"The blackest man white man in Ladbroke Grove"
Date: 2007-10-16 11:52 am (UTC)Re: "The blackest man white man in Ladbroke Grove"
Date: 2007-10-16 11:54 am (UTC)Re: "The blackest man white man in Ladbroke Grove"
Date: 2007-10-16 12:05 pm (UTC)Re: "The blackest man white man in Ladbroke Grove"
From:Re: "The blackest man white man in Ladbroke Grove"
Date: 2007-10-16 01:31 pm (UTC)Re: "The blackest man white man in Ladbroke Grove"
From:Re: "The blackest man white man in Ladbroke Grove"
From:Re: "The blackest man white man in Ladbroke Grove"
From:Re: "The blackest man white man in Ladbroke Grove"
From:ilm thread for the record
Date: 2007-10-16 12:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 02:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 03:14 pm (UTC)I was up too late trying to articulate a position that a bunch of other people have already expressed. But I will say that the ending still makes me uncomfortable, as it's identifying "black music" as sex-ful ("risky") and "white music" as sexless ("safe"), which seems like a variation on a pretty old (and itself racist) line of reasoning about the "inherent" sexual power of African-derived music. It's (even half-jokingly, sort of a pun on the origins of "rock and roll") suggesting that miscegenation (<--eek) will lead to, um, reflowering in indie rock.
Don't see how Americana (Wilco etc.) or choir/gospel (Sufjan, Arcade Fire) is "out of touch" with "black music," it's just out of touch with what Sasha (and most people, I'd bet) would call "black music." (And I think that even in terms of "contemporary black music," e.g., hip-hop beats are used prominently in plenty of stuff that "codes white" to most people: Caribou, Radiohead, Go! Team, etc.)
Anyway, if there's a racially based "indie rock problem," it's that its audience is almost exclusively white regardless of what it sounds like (as true at a Busdriver show as it is at a Wilco show, if Busdriver's lyrics are any indication). But that isn't the result of bands being influenced by "white music," it has to do with how the community perpetuates itself; it's subject to the same social/economic disparities based on race and class as any other media. If we're just talking about certain aspects of music (syncopation, funk, dub, reggae) then I don't know if I'd bother invoking "white music"/"black music" split, since the argument is 1000x more complicated than that and besides which for any given criteria (arbitrarily chosen) you could find counter-examples.
How long does it take to reflower?
Date: 2007-10-16 03:35 pm (UTC)