"The future is electro, female and DIY"
Dec. 17th, 2008 02:40 pmhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2008/dec/17/electro-pop-female-artists
AKA the Guardian has another pop at predicting the pop revival.
That said I like all the acts mentioned who I've actually heard. Perhaps this is the Real Thing!!!
AKA the Guardian has another pop at predicting the pop revival.
That said I like all the acts mentioned who I've actually heard. Perhaps this is the Real Thing!!!
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 02:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 02:59 pm (UTC)None of these women have the slightest idea how to construct a groove OR a song, either.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 03:00 pm (UTC)What did you think of White Town?
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 03:08 pm (UTC)'Your Woman' was OK I guess? Like, 7/10 if I was generous? I get the point of comparison but it wasn't all look-at-me about its DIY-ness or weirdness, it was just nicely understated if not all that special. Mostly saved by really good lyrics!
Really, going by La Roux and Florence & The Machine especially, the new trend is "Misunderstanding Kate Bush". I bet they all idolise her...for her "wackiness".
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 03:17 pm (UTC)Take your point about the Stuck On Repeat groove but nobody ever went aesthetically broke nicking "I Feel Love".
White Town may not have emphasised it in the song (though there was definitely a lo-fi vibe about it) but the promotion was totally look-at-me-I'm-DIY. La Roux has that same feel about her, but I still like "Quicksand" a lot, her shriekiness appeals wherever she's getting it from.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 03:19 pm (UTC)Agreed, particularly with the B-Sides. (Hell, release named for a PC error? Of course!) And I say this as someone who really liked that single.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 03:26 pm (UTC)I love Divine's version of "Walk Like A Man." But when I put it on a Why Music Sucks blindfold test it got nothing but derision.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 03:31 pm (UTC)La Roux's voice really irritates me - I don't dislike shriekiness as a rule but there seems so little POINT to what she's doing. The song doesn't move me because it's not about anything, it doesn't make me dance because it's so stilted, it's just not a very interesting song - but all of this is at odds with her statements and the imagery she uses and the mannerisms she employs, she couldn't be keener for us to note how interesting and arty she is. But she's just...not.
This is re: Lady Gaga more, but this Tim F post (http://www.ilxor.com/ILX/ThreadSelectedControllerServlet?boardid=41&threadid=65133) sums up where I feel this aesthetic goes wrong.
(And evn though I like 'Your Woman' I don't think it's a song which should be a blueprint for anyone. Its appeal is more of a one-off - it works despite itself.)
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 03:41 pm (UTC)La Roux' stiltedness kind of reminds me of Soft Cell's stiltedness (i.e. it's a 'good', jagged elbows stiltedness). I think it's almost impossible to come off as 'edgy' these days tho, and she's a mug for trying - Soft Cell had it easier.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 03:09 pm (UTC)Anyway you're right in that the test of DIY is whether the songs it produces are as strong or exciting as the dance-pop ones produced via non-DIY: in the case of GaGa I'm not convinced yet.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 03:12 pm (UTC)Luckily I don't particularly like her music, but calling herself Lady Gaga was an immediate and irredeemable black mark against her.
Dan Black and Florence & The Machine are the current nadirs of this little scene - surely it can't get worse than that.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 03:54 pm (UTC)I hadn't actually come across Dan Black, so thank you for that. Just took a gander at YouTube and "Yours" and, yeah, boring. Reminds me of my brother's obsession with also-tedious funk band Kings X about 10 years ago...
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 03:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 04:33 pm (UTC)they were funk METAL though, shurely? they used to be in RAW all the time...
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 03:22 pm (UTC)I liked the Ladyhawke track that charted in Britain this week. Thought you did too. Seems way more pop-goth than electro, however, no matter what its instrumentation. Song is well-constructed.
If someone's going to write about this stuff, wouldn't the success of "Paper Planes" and "L.E.S. Artistes" be relevant? Also Basshunter, but he's got a penis and therefore clearly he doesn't fit the trend. Have I mentioned that I hate trend pieces?(And why wouldn't Wiley etc. be relevant to what's supposedly replacing guitar bands on the charts?)
You need to watch the beginning of the Miss Universe swimsuit competition for some of the most charmingly inept dancing ever - not GaGa's, which isn't charming, but the contestants getting into it in the background, especially Miss Norway at 1:15.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 03:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 03:38 pm (UTC)Yeah Ladyhawke surprised me - she'll get lumped in with these acts b/c she's a hyped solo female, but stylistically she seems to have little to do with them - doesn't seem at all concerned with being "wacky", indeed doesn't seem concerned with much beyond how much she loves Stevie Nicks. Am going to give her album a try - am guessing it'll stand or fall on how much individuality she brings to her songwriting (though she has a head start on the likes of La Roux in that she seems to care about songwriting in the first place).
Agree that the critical success of MIA and Santogold definitely figures into the growth of this aesthetic - again less for what they said than their mannerisms - but closer to home, I have a feeling Kate Nash is more to blame. (Maybe they saw how successful she'd become while completely unencumbered by any sort of talent at all.)
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 04:03 pm (UTC)Conversely, Lady GaGa's "i'm interesting and arty" angle relies totally on her post-facto justification of it, there's nothing in her music or performances that would point to it. What's the opposite of the the Trojan Horse? The Emperor With No Clothes.
*nods*
TBH, I hadn't really thought of MIA or Santogold as especially mannered, which could mean that other people have a very different view of their attributes than I do, or that I'm so mired in mannerism that I can't see the wood for the trees! On 'quirky', though, I'm with
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 04:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 04:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 04:18 pm (UTC)Abstracting "Just Dance" from its role in a supposed trend or aesthetic, it's produced and co-written by the guy who did Kat DeLuna's "Whine Up" and stuff for Darin and the revived New Kids On The Block and the recreated Menudo etc., which is to say dance pop all the way. And dance pop songs are hitting all the time in Europe and Britain, though in the U.S. they have to compete against r&b and pop rock (and as I said, I think they roughened up "Let's Dance" to make it more "rock"). So the average listener (which in this case is me) isn't going to go "OMG, here is something new" or identify it with any trend beyond "pop." So my guess is that if this stuff (and are we actually talking about anyone more than La Roux and Lady GaGa?) is to be an actual chart trend it'll have to come through with the popcraft. In any event, its commercial rise and indie rock's supposed decline are unrelated, from what I can tell. (This is now me just grousing about the article. Have I mentioned that I hate trend pieces?)
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 04:44 pm (UTC)But Tim loses me completely when he talks about "vacuousness." I realize he doesn't mean it as an insult, but nonetheless it's false if you take him literally - i.e., that if songs or performers have no capital-S Significance then they have no content - but I don't know what else he means by it. If Britney's voice is vacuous, then so is Jolson's and Sinatra's and Presley's and Jagger's. And if dance pop means nothing to Tim - well, obviously that's not true, dance pop means a lot to Tim. Maybe I should give the post a more concentrated reading, since he proposes all these different subvariants, but he seems to be short-circuiting his ideas by letting a single word do too much of his thinking for him.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-17 03:06 pm (UTC)For someone who generally appreciates mannerisms in music, I have to say I agree with you there.