Date: 2008-04-25 12:23 pm (UTC)
koganbot: (Default)
From: [personal profile] koganbot
Not just formulaic, but capital-F Formulaic as if to say "I'm using the formula; it's not using me." Normally, such detachment loses me, but Annie usually connects, though often with her it takes a lot of listens for me to feel the connection. (Which might be the case here. I'm not melting or swooning yet.)

Date: 2008-04-25 12:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] damnspynovels.livejournal.com
Is this the opposite of grower that was being hinted at yesterday?

Hmmmmmmm.... it makes all the right noises doesn't it? But it's no Crush that's for sure.

Date: 2008-04-25 01:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dzilinebisa.livejournal.com
I suspect hope it'll grow on me.

Date: 2008-04-25 02:04 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-04-25 02:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com
With this and Alphabeat it's like there's a bit of pop which has dropped any pretence of just 'referencing' the 80s and are just in full-on pastiche mode. Which is great, I mean, I remember Sly Fox too! But with this I think there's a really good song and the curatorial production gets in its way - all those kitschy sproingy noises are a distraction really. The nostalgia fest only works when the material's weak.

So I still really like it, because it's a good tune, but the production's getting horribly in the way.

Date: 2008-04-25 03:16 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-04-29 01:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] umlauts.livejournal.com
Okay, I"m starting to agree with this. Catchy song, but the blips and beeps are actually quite obstructive; you actually have to listen REALLY HARD to hear the melody [/geir] and I find this very annoying. This didn't seem a problem before for Annie as the music was seldom as BUSY as this.

Also the ring-ding bit and the bit at the end are pretty stupid non-sequiturs.

Date: 2008-04-25 04:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] weasel-seeker.livejournal.com
The thing about Annie for me is that she's the epitome...well not of the popstar as cipher, that's Rachel Stevens or something. But of almost complete detachment.

This track has tuneage, 80s production tricks, "but now i'm thinking 'who's wearing your trousers now?'"...but I never buy much of it. Which is why Chewing Gum worked really well for me, because it felt kind of delightfully self-aware. Hopefully it'll grow on me.

Date: 2008-04-26 09:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alexmacpherson.livejournal.com
I really like this, agree w/ Frank re: formula. It's generic in the great way that lots of minor r&b cuts are generic. Dunno why people are disappointed esp given the dross I know you go nuts for!

I know who would do this song better though: PARIS HILTON.

Date: 2008-04-26 04:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skyecaptain.livejournal.com
New link: http://youtube.com/watch?v=5RQpb_I01D8

Actually, it's reminding me a lot of Melissa Lefton!

(PS - how have I never seen this video (http://youtube.com/watch?v=grxEdXMH4ok).)

Date: 2008-04-28 03:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] umlauts.livejournal.com
This is very poor, and omg, actually Paris Hilton WOULD do this better.

Not fit to be mentioned in the same sentence as the mighty Alphabeat.

Date: 2008-04-28 03:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] umlauts.livejournal.com
Okay the song's not too bad (though it is just a palsied Chewing Gum xerox in search of a more defining melody) but I really hate the video.

Date: 2008-04-28 01:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com
Er, it's kind of boring, isn't it? Then again I have just got back from three days of neo-rave mentalism so anything without a 120bpm drum and bass backing is sounding quite lacking right now.

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 31st, 2026 01:15 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios