BISMILLAH!
Apr. 15th, 2008 02:21 pmI am now only two entries away from this track on my Popular project (http://freakytrigger.co.uk/popular) so it's time to ask the wisest people I know about it:
[Poll #1171459]
Two other questions (which might be the same)
- Why do people like singles in multiple bits so much?
- Why is this record still so enormously beloved out in the wide world?
[Poll #1171459]
Two other questions (which might be the same)
- Why do people like singles in multiple bits so much?
- Why is this record still so enormously beloved out in the wide world?
no subject
Date: 2008-04-15 01:33 pm (UTC)See also: strong mental image of R0ss Str0ng and M4tth3w L4z3nby pretending to be Wayne and Garth in the playground.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-15 01:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-15 02:51 pm (UTC)When i visualise BoRhap i see...
Date: 2008-04-15 01:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-15 01:41 pm (UTC)I think Queen were better than this frequently (Killer Queen, Somebody to Love, Under Pressure, Seven Seas of Rhye, Good Old Fashioned Lover Boy etc) but Bohemian Rhapsody is like a really good greatest hits album in one song. Not bad at all.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-15 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-15 01:46 pm (UTC)Such as? If they did, they'd all be like that. And they're not. What singles are you thinking of?
no subject
Date: 2008-04-15 01:51 pm (UTC)Rephrase it as "Why do some multi-partite tracks do so well in polls of best songs of all time?" then.
Other suggestions?
Date: 2008-04-15 02:01 pm (UTC)Total Eclipse Ovva Heart (and all other Jim Steinman ever!)
Re: Other suggestions?
Date: 2008-04-15 02:22 pm (UTC)Re: Other suggestions?
Date: 2008-04-15 02:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-15 02:47 pm (UTC)Rhapiohead
Date: 2008-04-15 06:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-15 08:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-15 02:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-15 02:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-15 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-15 05:21 pm (UTC)last lousy point
Date: 2008-04-15 02:46 pm (UTC)Re: last lousy point
Date: 2008-04-15 03:11 pm (UTC)Re: last lousy point
Date: 2008-04-15 03:24 pm (UTC)LOVE
LEX LOGGED OUT AND IN TOKYO
Re: last lousy point
Date: 2008-04-15 03:30 pm (UTC)LOVE
THE REAL LEX LOGGED OUT AND IN TOKYO
Re: last lousy point
Date: 2008-04-15 03:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-15 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-15 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-15 05:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-16 11:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-17 05:14 am (UTC)