OK maybe a "quite good" one.
I thought about this in the wake of the "Dakota" controversy earlier this year. There are actually not v.many artists who have managed to avoid making at least one record that works as pop somehow. I think the Stereophonics might still qualify but many wd defend that song at least.
So name some and we can try to think of counter-examples from amidst their oeoeoeuvre.
Obviously this does not count i) people who've only been around for one record and are still getting their fun-hating phase out the way, ii) Wire magazine regulars.
I will be posting an important piece of evidence later today.
I thought about this in the wake of the "Dakota" controversy earlier this year. There are actually not v.many artists who have managed to avoid making at least one record that works as pop somehow. I think the Stereophonics might still qualify but many wd defend that song at least.
So name some and we can try to think of counter-examples from amidst their oeoeoeuvre.
Obviously this does not count i) people who've only been around for one record and are still getting their fun-hating phase out the way, ii) Wire magazine regulars.
I will be posting an important piece of evidence later today.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 02:11 pm (UTC)we are picking people what aren't pop and then someone else goes "ah, aaah, but no"
no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 02:13 pm (UTC)(Said records might be something else as well as pop though innit)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 02:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 02:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 02:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 02:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 02:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:I JUDGE THAT...
From:Re: I JUDGE THAT...
From:Re: I JUDGE THAT...
From:Re: I JUDGE THAT...
From:Re: I JUDGE THAT...
From:no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 02:31 pm (UTC)I am probably being too subjective about this though...
no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 02:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 02:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 02:46 pm (UTC)Maybe the first we take Manhattan, then we take Berlin one?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 02:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 02:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:i judge that...
Date: 2005-11-04 03:07 pm (UTC)Re: i judge that...
Date: 2005-11-04 03:08 pm (UTC)Re: i judge that...
From:Re: i judge that...
From:Re: i judge that...
From:Re: i judge that...
From:Re: i judge that...
From:Re: i judge that...
From:Re: i judge that...
From:Re: i judge that...
From:Re: i judge that...
From:no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 07:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 04:38 pm (UTC)But how are you defining artists?
You can't say that Yoko Ono ever made a popular pop record.
And I'm not sure the St Winifred School Choir are pop even though they had a number one. At least, no one will play them at poptimism, even though I keep asking.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 04:39 pm (UTC)winetime re. St Win's.Walking On Thin Ice = pop surely?
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 04:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 04:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:I JUDGE THAT...
Date: 2005-11-04 06:30 pm (UTC)...
... SLEEPER
Re: I JUDGE THAT...
Date: 2005-11-04 07:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 06:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 07:50 pm (UTC)