OK maybe a "quite good" one.
I thought about this in the wake of the "Dakota" controversy earlier this year. There are actually not v.many artists who have managed to avoid making at least one record that works as pop somehow. I think the Stereophonics might still qualify but many wd defend that song at least.
So name some and we can try to think of counter-examples from amidst their oeoeoeuvre.
Obviously this does not count i) people who've only been around for one record and are still getting their fun-hating phase out the way, ii) Wire magazine regulars.
I will be posting an important piece of evidence later today.
I thought about this in the wake of the "Dakota" controversy earlier this year. There are actually not v.many artists who have managed to avoid making at least one record that works as pop somehow. I think the Stereophonics might still qualify but many wd defend that song at least.
So name some and we can try to think of counter-examples from amidst their oeoeoeuvre.
Obviously this does not count i) people who've only been around for one record and are still getting their fun-hating phase out the way, ii) Wire magazine regulars.
I will be posting an important piece of evidence later today.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 02:11 pm (UTC)we are picking people what aren't pop and then someone else goes "ah, aaah, but no"
no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 02:13 pm (UTC)(Said records might be something else as well as pop though innit)
no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 02:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 02:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 02:32 pm (UTC)But yeah it's an interesting point! I was thinking about good pop I will grant you, or records which "work" on a pop level even if they might not be good in other ways. As ever I'm trying to keep things pretty vague.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 02:39 pm (UTC)There are probably several people who might be able to make great non-pop but never great pop, though. Diamanda Galás, say.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-04 07:42 pm (UTC)