[identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists
I'm not going to bother listing all 500 - here's the link: http://pitchfork.com/p2k/ and here's the Top 20:

20. The Walkmen - The Rat
19. R. Kelly - Ignition (Remix)
18. Hercules and Love Affair - Blind
17. Annie - Heartbeat
16. The Rapture - House of Jealous Lovers
15. The Knife - Heartbeats
14. Jay-Z - 99 Problems
13. LCD Soundsystem - Losing My Edge
12. OutKast - Hey Ya!
11. Gnarls Barkley - Crazy
10. Arcade Fire - Neighbourhood #1 (Tunnels)
9. Animal Collective - My Girls
8. Radiohead - Idioteque
7. Missy Elliott - Get Ur Freak On
6. Yeah Yeah Yeahs - Maps
5. Daft Punk - One More Time
4. Beyonce ft Jay-Z - Crazy in Love
3. M.I.A. ft Bun B and Rich Boy - Paper Planes (Diplo Remix)
2. LCD Soundsystem - All My Friends
1. OutKast - B.O.B

(I voted in this and did a few blurbs, by the way. The top 200 have blurbs and IMHO they are an excellent way of whiling a few hours away)

Date: 2009-08-21 11:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com
But there's a time-lag between everyone knowing stuff, and everyone KNOWING that everyone knows it: that's what our responses to these lists reveal. (That's what they're useful for, in fact.)

Date: 2009-08-21 11:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alexmacpherson.livejournal.com
Everyone knowing that everyone knows stuff is a step too far in unnecessariness! Hmm I wonder if that is a word.

Also blah blah blah re: whose canon and whose values determine this, eg the top Jay-Z song is the rock one, the strong impression that "stepping (self-)consciously outside genre" is to be rewarded &c &c.

Date: 2009-08-21 12:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com
Everyone knowing that everyone knows stuff is a step too far in unnecessariness! : no, it's basic games theory. Your judgment how to vote to counter the flow depends on a knowledge of how others will vote.

"Whose canon": it's only ever going to be the canon of who gets to vote in a given poll -- but the identification of this can only be determined after the fact, if people are voting "truthfully" as opposed to consciously tribally (or with a view to determining the state of the consensus; rather than a snapshot of quality). It *is* shallow history (Mr I-hate-history!) but the journalist's role is the first draft of same; not the final draft. Juornalism provides the tipsheet for dissent and counterargument.

Rival lists would be interesting: we need to see some... but what are the Other Tribes? The moment a Lexist School emerges as a list-making organisation (boycotted by you obv: I mean tastewise), all the things you're worrying about will instantly re-emerge within Lexism. They're an artefact of how we fence with the opinions of others -- the aggregate of all the individual dialectics of affirmation and refusal

Date: 2009-08-21 12:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com
"the identification of this" -- i mean, the identification of whose tribe the poll's taste represents

Date: 2009-08-21 04:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chezghost.livejournal.com
" Your judgment how to vote to counter the flow depends on a knowledge of how others will vote. "

I've been rocking this hard on the poptimists 00s polls but then they are of little consequence/less reach

Date: 2009-08-21 09:36 pm (UTC)
koganbot: (Default)
From: [personal profile] koganbot
I think that what I'm getting at in my dissent downthread is that you've made the threshold too accessible/placed the bar too low for what I think the word "canon" means. Canon is not "tops a poll" or even "tops a lot of polls," but more like, "tops the poll and we don't foresee that it will be dislodged among people like us or successor 'people like us.'" Of course, such canonization is often shortsighted, and even in its time it doesn't require unanimity - I knew rock fans c. 1970 who thought that the Beatles were hopeless wimps, others who thought the Stones were overrated and insufficiently imaginative, and many many many others who thought Dylan was too intellectual to be real. Still, at the time it was hard to imagine how they would be taken down. Whereas it's easy to see "99 Problems" never actually planting itself in a pantheon given that it pretty much only outranks "Big Pimpin'" among voters who don't pay deep attention to Jay-Z. And I can easily imagine Jay-Z and Timbaland not retaining enough cultural presence to hold on, and "Get Ur Freak On" getting lost, or anyway just being another song among songs, though that wouldn't be my judgment.

There was a Timberlake/T.I. track that placed second in Jackin' Pop a couple of years ago. I've forgotten its name, though I could find out in a second and it placed top 50 on the Pitchfork list, but does its future seem assured, its cultural weight a given, a listenership in line for it for the next ten years?

Date: 2009-08-21 10:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mcarratala.livejournal.com
Here's a promise: every time you claim this about 99 Problems, I will repeat that this is just you demonstrating your awesome ignorance of hip hop history for our entertainment.

Date: 2009-08-22 12:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alexmacpherson.livejournal.com
here's a promise: every time you repeat this, i will repeat that this is just you demonstrating your awesome ignorance of current hip-hop.

fuck off and stop patronising me.

Date: 2009-08-21 08:55 pm (UTC)
koganbot: (Default)
From: [personal profile] koganbot
I assume that there's some tension between Pitchfork writers and Pitchfork readers (though of course neither set is homogenous).

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 22nd, 2026 06:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios