Yet Another Year In Pop: 29
Jul. 20th, 2009 12:19 pmI know this is going to come as a shock to all of you, but X Factor runners-up JLS are at number 1. Cascada's down to 2 and the Black Indie Peas are up to 3.
[Poll #1432261]
Jacko watch: you might have forgotten that some old popstar died last month but the general public haven't - Jacko still has 18 songs in the top 100.
Poll reminder: you have until tomorrow lunchtime to vote in Heat #1 of 2001.
[Poll #1432261]
Jacko watch: you might have forgotten that some old popstar died last month but the general public haven't - Jacko still has 18 songs in the top 100.
Poll reminder: you have until tomorrow lunchtime to vote in Heat #1 of 2001.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 02:26 pm (UTC)You know, the phrase "have to explain themselves" is a form of bullying.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 03:04 pm (UTC)To me, it's really obnoxiously smug and makes me want to die a little; this is because it reminds me (and probably Lex) of my/his indie friends going 'LOL HIP HOP LOLZ LOOK AT ME' and also I find it mostly unlistenable and the nudity in the video makes me feel a bit ill for some reason. Obviously that's not the case for everyone and fair play; god knows a lot of the music I like is deeply offensive to others; I really, really like Jamie T, after all.
But yeah, I meant no harm, I'm just at work and boisterous because I've been up since sh1t o'clock.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 03:23 pm (UTC)But anyway, I don't hear an indie sensibility in this track at all. I type 3OH!3 as electrodance with a rock heart that's half frat and half stoner, and though they do veer hip-hop on some tracks, they don't on this one, and when they do it's not in a way that goes "Isn't it funny that we're doing hip-hop," rather just hip-hop as a vehicle for their sense of fun, like Eminem or the Beastie Boys. (Unfortunately, YouTube surfing their tracks last month I couldn't find anything other than this that was in Eminem's or the Beastie Boys' league.)
no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 03:37 pm (UTC)In contrast, Metro Station I can kind of see are fun (to me the two sound musically very similar) in a sort of 'has no idea how uncool this looks' way, which I can get onboard with to a certain extent.
Plus, as is well-established me and Lex hate all fun.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 06:56 am (UTC)For me, Panic! At The Disco did the arrogance and cut-up-ness really well on their first album, whereas 3OH3 feel more like a bad comedy sketch, I'm afraid. And also quite creepy. I dunno; if it's serious then it's just really bad music and if it's comedy then it's just really not funny.
Maybe this is one of those Atlantic divides. Although I'm tempted to call it 'one of those times when me and Lex agree, thus proving FACT' -I dunno, I really do find it deeply offensive as a piece of music.
THEN AGAIN I was listening to Enter Shikari a lot last week so what do I know, etc.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 11:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 12:11 pm (UTC)However if the discussion does descend into attacks on a person rather than on their opinion, then that's not on. Jokes are fine but they're only funny as long as the person(s) targeted find it funny. As a mod I really try to be light-handed with regard to stepping in and stopping discussion when people are actually on-topic, but if it does get out of hand then let me know and I'll try and intervene sensibly.
In the case of La Roux (whom I dislike intensely) I would be totally willing to hear a case for her defence as long as it was reasonably well grounded (ie something more substantial than 'her video is great buy it on itunes now'). In fact, that spammer coughed up some really good discussion on La Roux & her remixes. But it would have to be a VERY good argument in her case. Lady Gaga seems like a guardian angel of pop in comparison.
Thinking about it, I think one reason the Lex often gets frustrated with
no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 12:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 12:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 01:53 pm (UTC)La Roux & Lady Gaga feel like big enough targets that either people like them and can and will shout back (and it would seem that they are rare near-consensus fails) or will write enthusiasticly about them or, well, they won't. They're so ubiquitous and Popbloodyjustice (who I got on immensely well with as a person but has obviously GONE MAD) is supporting both so much that I think there's a vague sense of 'well go over there then.' If I went mental tomorrow and started loving La Roux tho I think there'd just be an excellent pop FITE. I've repped for hugely unpopular things before despite everyone going 'NOEZ ARGH THE HORROR,' even when I was barely more than a wee lurker.
...I did put 'Quicksand' and 'Just Dance' in my top thirty of 2008 so, y'know.
I dunno, I'm a bit of a bad example as a mod but we did start talking to each other in an all-guns-blazing trillion-word argument between me, you and Lex. It seems healthy when everyone's as invested in music as we are around here that we all shout at each other, provided there's still respect there somewhere.
Main thing that bothers me about Poptimists is lurkers not posting, hence the fact I offered them out as well.
This is so disjointed and I need to pretend to work slightly more but eh.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 11:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 03:11 pm (UTC)i guess it reminds me of CPHATB - not necessarily in sounding similar, so then not surprised that anyone who likes that would also like this
no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 03:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 04:29 pm (UTC)