Yet Another Year In Pop: 29
Jul. 20th, 2009 12:19 pmI know this is going to come as a shock to all of you, but X Factor runners-up JLS are at number 1. Cascada's down to 2 and the Black Indie Peas are up to 3.
[Poll #1432261]
Jacko watch: you might have forgotten that some old popstar died last month but the general public haven't - Jacko still has 18 songs in the top 100.
Poll reminder: you have until tomorrow lunchtime to vote in Heat #1 of 2001.
[Poll #1432261]
Jacko watch: you might have forgotten that some old popstar died last month but the general public haven't - Jacko still has 18 songs in the top 100.
Poll reminder: you have until tomorrow lunchtime to vote in Heat #1 of 2001.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 11:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 11:27 am (UTC)I hope SOMEONE is at #1 for a decent spell tho, I could do with catch-up time on the Popular halfway point.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 11:31 am (UTC)I am still not totally convinced by the JLS but alright go on then, am wholly convinced by Poppiholla just because I fvcking HATE Sigur Ros and approve thoroughly of how much it must be annoying their fans, Beyonce is a lot better than the video makes out.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 12:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 12:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 12:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 12:22 pm (UTC)I notice we have a clean sheet for now but it's only ever a matter of time...
no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 12:33 pm (UTC)Still, the fact that Jacko didn't get to #1 (when Elvis, Lennon and Freddie Mercury all did so easily after leaving the planet) says something. I'm just not sure what it is.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 12:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 12:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 01:02 pm (UTC)Did any poptimists buy any MJ songs? If so, what?
no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 01:19 pm (UTC)i also think MJ songs would've done better had they not already been re-released a couple of years back, to less success than Elvis. Jacko really has relatively underperformed in the UK charts traditionally - looks like that will continue for better/worse.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 02:26 pm (UTC)You know, the phrase "have to explain themselves" is a form of bullying.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 02:48 pm (UTC)Chicane "Poppiholla": Instantly recognized the song it's reworking even though I had had no idea I'd heard the original. Kinda only half works, beats crowding more busily than they should, and when it's grooving along in its nice way the music swells in ways that are more distracting than lifting. But is pretty enough and flowing enough. BORDERLINE TICK.
Beyoncé "Sweet Dreams": Well, setting up a song and then having the arrangement chip at and challenge the very song it's supposed to be supporting is something she was doing back in the Destiny's Child days, but if anything she gets more challenging and edgy and confused as she gets older, constantly assertive but uneasily so, never sure where to direct that assertion. TICK.
3OH!3 "Don't Trust Me": See my response to Moggy above. TICK TICK TICK.
Green Day "21 Guns": Gave this a tick on the borderline when it came through Another Year In America, feeling generous on account of the melody and Billy Joe's at least trying a falsetto swoop. Still, a "legitimate" song like this is just wrong for them, and the nasal callowness undoes it. BORDERLINE NONTICK.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 03:04 pm (UTC)To me, it's really obnoxiously smug and makes me want to die a little; this is because it reminds me (and probably Lex) of my/his indie friends going 'LOL HIP HOP LOLZ LOOK AT ME' and also I find it mostly unlistenable and the nudity in the video makes me feel a bit ill for some reason. Obviously that's not the case for everyone and fair play; god knows a lot of the music I like is deeply offensive to others; I really, really like Jamie T, after all.
But yeah, I meant no harm, I'm just at work and boisterous because I've been up since sh1t o'clock.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 03:11 pm (UTC)i guess it reminds me of CPHATB - not necessarily in sounding similar, so then not surprised that anyone who likes that would also like this
no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 03:23 pm (UTC)But anyway, I don't hear an indie sensibility in this track at all. I type 3OH!3 as electrodance with a rock heart that's half frat and half stoner, and though they do veer hip-hop on some tracks, they don't on this one, and when they do it's not in a way that goes "Isn't it funny that we're doing hip-hop," rather just hip-hop as a vehicle for their sense of fun, like Eminem or the Beastie Boys. (Unfortunately, YouTube surfing their tracks last month I couldn't find anything other than this that was in Eminem's or the Beastie Boys' league.)
no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 03:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 03:37 pm (UTC)In contrast, Metro Station I can kind of see are fun (to me the two sound musically very similar) in a sort of 'has no idea how uncool this looks' way, which I can get onboard with to a certain extent.
Plus, as is well-established me and Lex hate all fun.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 03:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 04:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 10:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 10:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 03:23 am (UTC)* -- Actually, just noticed that Frank points that out as well.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 06:56 am (UTC)For me, Panic! At The Disco did the arrogance and cut-up-ness really well on their first album, whereas 3OH3 feel more like a bad comedy sketch, I'm afraid. And also quite creepy. I dunno; if it's serious then it's just really bad music and if it's comedy then it's just really not funny.
Maybe this is one of those Atlantic divides. Although I'm tempted to call it 'one of those times when me and Lex agree, thus proving FACT' -I dunno, I really do find it deeply offensive as a piece of music.
THEN AGAIN I was listening to Enter Shikari a lot last week so what do I know, etc.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 07:31 am (UTC)Idk, because even in the cold light of 8am, I am prepared to defend my bullheadedness about it on the basis it is offensive, sleazy and cheap. I mean, my mum refused to buy me the last Kylie album a few Christmasses ago but that doesn't mean Kylie's necessary due to controversy. (She is necessary due to being amazing, obv)
Plus, as I said, I shout but that doesn't mean I'm being aggressive; Poptimists on the whole are quite boisterous, hence the fact we bounce around the club night yelling 'turn off this indie sh1t' at each other and things. *shrug* It's all in good fun. Plus me and Lex have to be allowed to hate some things; I do keep my mouth shut about Taylor Swift most of the time, after all.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 11:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 11:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 11:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 12:11 pm (UTC)However if the discussion does descend into attacks on a person rather than on their opinion, then that's not on. Jokes are fine but they're only funny as long as the person(s) targeted find it funny. As a mod I really try to be light-handed with regard to stepping in and stopping discussion when people are actually on-topic, but if it does get out of hand then let me know and I'll try and intervene sensibly.
In the case of La Roux (whom I dislike intensely) I would be totally willing to hear a case for her defence as long as it was reasonably well grounded (ie something more substantial than 'her video is great buy it on itunes now'). In fact, that spammer coughed up some really good discussion on La Roux & her remixes. But it would have to be a VERY good argument in her case. Lady Gaga seems like a guardian angel of pop in comparison.
Thinking about it, I think one reason the Lex often gets frustrated with
no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 12:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 12:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 01:53 pm (UTC)La Roux & Lady Gaga feel like big enough targets that either people like them and can and will shout back (and it would seem that they are rare near-consensus fails) or will write enthusiasticly about them or, well, they won't. They're so ubiquitous and Popbloodyjustice (who I got on immensely well with as a person but has obviously GONE MAD) is supporting both so much that I think there's a vague sense of 'well go over there then.' If I went mental tomorrow and started loving La Roux tho I think there'd just be an excellent pop FITE. I've repped for hugely unpopular things before despite everyone going 'NOEZ ARGH THE HORROR,' even when I was barely more than a wee lurker.
...I did put 'Quicksand' and 'Just Dance' in my top thirty of 2008 so, y'know.
I dunno, I'm a bit of a bad example as a mod but we did start talking to each other in an all-guns-blazing trillion-word argument between me, you and Lex. It seems healthy when everyone's as invested in music as we are around here that we all shout at each other, provided there's still respect there somewhere.
Main thing that bothers me about Poptimists is lurkers not posting, hence the fact I offered them out as well.
This is so disjointed and I need to pretend to work slightly more but eh.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 11:24 pm (UTC)