![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
freakytigger.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
poptimistsThis is a question for people who didn't experience punk firsthand (sorry o wise eldersaurs!)
How did the ideas/legacy/presence of punk affect your listening to and thinking about music?
(I didn't say it was a small question)
And do you still feel it as a presence within pop music and culture? Does it affect current music? Does it affect how you approach the music that came before it?
I'm interested in 'my' generation of listeners (30somethings) but also especially in 20somethings and younger - and in British people especially.
How did the ideas/legacy/presence of punk affect your listening to and thinking about music?
(I didn't say it was a small question)
And do you still feel it as a presence within pop music and culture? Does it affect current music? Does it affect how you approach the music that came before it?
I'm interested in 'my' generation of listeners (30somethings) but also especially in 20somethings and younger - and in British people especially.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2007-08-20 04:43 pm (UTC)i. Older writer pens regretful I-was-wrong piece which often turns out to be "the world has changed and so I have too".
ii. Younger writers write about how inspirational the old stuffz were.
There's no NEED for 50 yr olds to crow about their 18 year old tastes when 30 yr olds can vicariously crow about it for them.