Listening With Context
Jul. 10th, 2007 04:42 pmFollowing up from the poll (poor old Incubus)
Do you carry in your head an idea of the "average listener" as any kind of reference point? Did you ever? (whether you defined yrself for or against her/him)
aka - who ARE these "masses", anyway?
Do you carry in your head an idea of the "average listener" as any kind of reference point? Did you ever? (whether you defined yrself for or against her/him)
aka - who ARE these "masses", anyway?
no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 04:05 pm (UTC)Er...to actually answer yer question, yes, I think I am now and have ever been the average listener. I still can be on occasion, driving with my sister in the car and asking her what that song on the radio is, listening more casually. (For a guy who tries to keep up with chart pop, I sure do miss a buncha songs they actually play on radios occasionally, because I never actually listen to it.)
Marketing
Date: 2007-07-10 04:18 pm (UTC)Marketing, like criticism, is about providing someone with a context in which they might act. But the acting or not is up to them.
So yes, nobody is marketed into liking a song in the way people who assume they're immune to marketing imagine we are - but that doesn't mean marketing has no effect.
Tashbed/Feeling mashup
Date: 2007-07-10 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 04:25 pm (UTC)one of them is herself actually a really excellent singer -- x-factor quality singer, who only missed out on a real-actual professional jazzsinger career as a teen for family reasons -- but just not a reader, beyond (non-broadsheet) newspapers... so i'm always interested in their perspective, not cz i think it's "more real" (or "more average" or "more ideal"), but bcz i'm deeply interested in what the relationship between music and writing is, culturally, and the differences between her tastes and mine are instructive
no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 06:02 pm (UTC)- the non-obsessive about popular music - "12 CD man/woman" as we used to simplify them to on ILM. My sister and her family would be representatives of said majority. They exist as an important reality check, but I don't worry particularly about not being like them or them not being like me.
- people who phone in to Radio 1, requesting records or entering competitions (and going apeshit when they win). This is a much more puzzling community to me. I wish I understood them better.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-10 06:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-11 09:29 am (UTC)I'm not sure if the "average listener" actually likes music v much - I don't mean that they don't like what they buy, but they don't like music as a pursuit or hobby, just as I will watch and pay vague attention to major golf tournaments but wouldn't call myself a fan, only know the famous names, don't know anything about it in a technical sense.
It's basically indefensible but I am v v snobby and disapproving of "casual fans" of the things I love - I think they do immense harm to (coverage of) (and thus marketing of) tennis, and, y'know, I think they're pretty awful for music as well!
Haven't really thought about this enough to back it up but a conception of the "average music fan" as a typical straight-white-middle-class-man is what I do automatically think of, ie a demographic with not only the consuming power but the (gah, what is the WORD HERE)...structural power, to actually affect lists like this at the top end. ie not only do they have enough money to buy CDs of terrible straight white man bands, but they're also more likely to be in positions of power and influence within the music industry, and in all the other positions of power and influence which affect the decisions the music industry makes.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-11 12:21 pm (UTC)I can't see how the casual or average fans harm music - without them, not much music would get made, distributed and shown. Don't you see Beyonce as being as much an 'average' taste as the guitar bands you dislike?