Sadly not - this wd still be a listener for Ciara (AND all the others). (I agree though that last FM is INSTITUTIONALLY SOMETHINGIST in terms of how it deals with our friend "ft.")
I'm pretty sure Ciara, Ciara ft Ludacris, Ciara feat Ludacris and so on are all counted as different artists - though Oh, Oh ft Ludacris, Oh feat Ludacris, Oh (ft Ludacris), Oh (feat Ludacris) and so on are all credited as plays for Ciara (but as different songs thus reducing the song's number of plays...)
INSTITUTIONALLY RACISTANTI-SOCIAL: collaborations are signifiers of social skillz and no one who listens to those top 30 artists could possibly have social skills.
Yes, they are counted as different artists, but it makes little difference in the example you cited as long as ONE track on the album is correctly marked.
It might make a difference with eg Umbrella, if single-play listeners are split between Rihanna and Rihanna ft Jay-Z.
Oh indeed - but then listeners to this sort of music don't tend to listen to albums. In the week that Umbrella leaked, most of its listeners probably listened to no other Rihanna - but the Rihanna/Rihanna ft/feat Jay-Z split probably ensured that it never placed near this list :(
Re: Album artists
Date: 2007-07-10 04:31 pm (UTC)Re: Album artists
Date: 2007-07-10 04:46 pm (UTC)INSTITUTIONALLY
RACISTANTI-SOCIAL: collaborations are signifiers of social skillz and no one who listens to those top 30 artists could possibly have social skills.Re: Album artists
Date: 2007-07-10 04:49 pm (UTC)It might make a difference with eg Umbrella, if single-play listeners are split between Rihanna and Rihanna ft Jay-Z.
Re: Album artists
Date: 2007-07-10 04:59 pm (UTC)Re: Album artists
Date: 2007-07-10 05:04 pm (UTC)She's at #69 on this list - phwoar etc.
I doubt leaks register in the top 30, to be honest.