Polling Without Context
Jul. 10th, 2007 03:00 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
freakytigger.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
poptimistsfreakytigger.livejournal.com posting in poptimistsfreakytigger.livejournal.com posting in poptimists
Profile
Poptimists
Page Summary
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Re: Other questions
Date: 2007-07-10 02:37 pm (UTC)Battle of the back catalogues: Led Zep but no Stones? And were Queen really big in America?
Re: Other questions
Date: 2007-07-10 02:42 pm (UTC)I am actually quite surprised by the Beatles.
Stones at #43
Re: Other questions
Date: 2007-07-10 02:49 pm (UTC)Now you mention it, the lack of Stones in that list is quite a surprise.
Re: Other questions
Date: 2007-07-10 07:57 pm (UTC)That's the way I always explained it. It hasn't changed so much, you know.
See also: Jimmy Eat World.
Re: Other questions
Date: 2007-07-10 08:01 pm (UTC)Exactly! But the road from Jimmy Eat World to My Chemical Romance is beyond me. Where did the goths sneakily insert their genes?
In fact Pete Wenz: what's that all about?
Re: Other questions
Date: 2007-07-10 08:06 pm (UTC)