[identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists
I got absorbed enough in this Guardian piece to miss my tube stop:

http://music.guardian.co.uk/folk/story/0,,2071468,00.html

A lot of its anecdotal material is good and I can't much disagree with the central argument (tho as they admit Tosches summarises it more neatly) but I didn't like the conclusion - even as a staunch poptimist "the inherent democracy of pop junk" is a MASSIVE handwave.

Date: 2007-05-04 09:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blue-russian.livejournal.com
Even without the subhead, I was uncomfortable in the first few grafs:

One of the main tasks folk song collectors have always faced is choosing which of the many songs their informants sing are folk songs and which aren't....But it's not always so clear, especially when informants claim that all their songs are traditional, which, since they are usually being paid per song, they usually will.

Conjures up imagines of men in spectacles with tape recorders grilling impoverished and grizzled old men with guitars.

Date: 2007-05-04 09:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] carsmilesteve.livejournal.com
but isn't that what lomax and sharp did?

(i am not certain, but that was my understanding of how they did their field recordings)

Date: 2007-05-04 09:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] boyofbadgers.livejournal.com
It is exactly what they did!

Date: 2007-05-04 09:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] boyofbadgers.livejournal.com
Well, in the early days it was with pen and paper, but the point still stands.

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 9th, 2026 05:57 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios