Folkwrongica
May. 4th, 2007 10:22 amI got absorbed enough in this Guardian piece to miss my tube stop:
http://music.guardian.co.uk/folk/story/0,,2071468,00.html
A lot of its anecdotal material is good and I can't much disagree with the central argument (tho as they admit Tosches summarises it more neatly) but I didn't like the conclusion - even as a staunch poptimist "the inherent democracy of pop junk" is a MASSIVE handwave.
http://music.guardian.co.uk/folk/story/0,,2071468,00.html
A lot of its anecdotal material is good and I can't much disagree with the central argument (tho as they admit Tosches summarises it more neatly) but I didn't like the conclusion - even as a staunch poptimist "the inherent democracy of pop junk" is a MASSIVE handwave.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-04 09:41 am (UTC)One of the main tasks folk song collectors have always faced is choosing which of the many songs their informants sing are folk songs and which aren't....But it's not always so clear, especially when informants claim that all their songs are traditional, which, since they are usually being paid per song, they usually will.
Conjures up imagines of men in spectacles with tape recorders grilling impoverished and grizzled old men with guitars.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-04 09:42 am (UTC)(i am not certain, but that was my understanding of how they did their field recordings)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-04 09:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-04 09:49 am (UTC)