I've still not decided (see yesterday evening's poll) about what to do with the P&J results, but it struck me reading
epicharmus' suggestion of a poll of polls (the very thought!) that it's frustrating the the Village Voice didn't do singles/tracks polls before 1979. How can the opinion of Poptimists towards older music be best assessed?
Not like this, probably. What we have here is a poll based on the most recent Rolling Stone Top 500 Songs Of All Time. I ran out of patience after a mere 45 songs so this is the much-pored-over cream of the "rock canon" in its single-tracked form (not in 'singles form' - a few weighty album numbers sneak in). I removed the tracks that also appeared in Pazz and Jop polls, for comparability purposes with the gigantic spreadsheet. In practise this was only THREE songs - can anyone guess which they were (without peeking at rollingstone.com)?
Anyway I thought it would be interesting to get some poptimists perspectives on the 'rock canon' as it has been handed down to us by J Wenner Esq and friends.
You get FIFTEEN picks from an inapt 45 tracks.
[Poll #907822]
The second 'week in pop' poll will appear tomorrow, for the selfish reason that I can listen to a few of the tracks in it before then.
Not like this, probably. What we have here is a poll based on the most recent Rolling Stone Top 500 Songs Of All Time. I ran out of patience after a mere 45 songs so this is the much-pored-over cream of the "rock canon" in its single-tracked form (not in 'singles form' - a few weighty album numbers sneak in). I removed the tracks that also appeared in Pazz and Jop polls, for comparability purposes with the gigantic spreadsheet. In practise this was only THREE songs - can anyone guess which they were (without peeking at rollingstone.com)?
Anyway I thought it would be interesting to get some poptimists perspectives on the 'rock canon' as it has been handed down to us by J Wenner Esq and friends.
You get FIFTEEN picks from an inapt 45 tracks.
[Poll #907822]
The second 'week in pop' poll will appear tomorrow, for the selfish reason that I can listen to a few of the tracks in it before then.
Re: Omissions
Date: 2007-01-16 03:57 pm (UTC)Re: Omissions
Date: 2007-01-16 04:40 pm (UTC)Re: Omissions
Date: 2007-01-16 04:40 pm (UTC)Re: Omissions
Date: 2007-01-16 04:47 pm (UTC)When this list came out I remember thinking it was a very deliberate, strong, They-Shall-Not-Pass restatement of the 60s/70s-oriented, rock-oriented Rolling Stone brand, because as you say normally one or two surprise elements sneak in, but not here. It almost felt like a reply to Spin, Blender, the Internet, whatever - "Nope. This is still what matters. Always was. Always will be."