morrissey = the new david byrne
Sep. 21st, 2006 03:21 pmok usually when i do this kind of thing i frame the question fast and badly (or i wd never frame it at all) and
koganbot becomes testy towards my fuzziness
but here is MY "explanation" of morrissey = he brought something to the boywing of britrock = called CAMP -- as in polari, as in an angry bitchy code against the UNSTYLISH USELESSNESS of the STRAIGHTS -- except that, since he wz militantly coy abt his sexuality (korrektly, as "coming out" would have stripped a powerful ambiguity out of what he wz doin), his camp was developed as a kind of MALE HET camp...
ANYWAY -- i have always bin ambivalent abt camp as an attitude (it's quickwitted and funny but it's also a compensatory attitude adopted by those who take themselves to be victims and are sniping secretly back...)
and given the shifts since the mid-80s in fashions in sexuality and within sexuality blah blah, i think morrissey's STYLE (sex! yes! but not for me...) reveals itself as a lot more reactionary a-and larkinesque than it did at the time
(again i feel i have not got at the nubbin of what i'm on about but have at it anyway)
but here is MY "explanation" of morrissey = he brought something to the boywing of britrock = called CAMP -- as in polari, as in an angry bitchy code against the UNSTYLISH USELESSNESS of the STRAIGHTS -- except that, since he wz militantly coy abt his sexuality (korrektly, as "coming out" would have stripped a powerful ambiguity out of what he wz doin), his camp was developed as a kind of MALE HET camp...
ANYWAY -- i have always bin ambivalent abt camp as an attitude (it's quickwitted and funny but it's also a compensatory attitude adopted by those who take themselves to be victims and are sniping secretly back...)
and given the shifts since the mid-80s in fashions in sexuality and within sexuality blah blah, i think morrissey's STYLE (sex! yes! but not for me...) reveals itself as a lot more reactionary a-and larkinesque than it did at the time
(again i feel i have not got at the nubbin of what i'm on about but have at it anyway)
Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD
Date: 2006-09-22 11:41 am (UTC)(also: in the bi male haha "community", esp.of a certain age -- mine -- there are a LOT of very unconfident how you say "social retards" who were actually not bi at all but full-on gay, except really alienated from the enforced manners of the clone-style of the day and unhappy that they didn't accord with the brazen fronting stereotype)
Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD
Date: 2006-09-22 11:45 am (UTC)this is a list of contradictions btw, not a series of points towards an argument
Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD
Date: 2006-09-22 11:50 am (UTC)"Girls like the Smiths" = "girls have terrible terrible taste in men"! It is the same thing as girls nowadays going crazy for Bright Eyes or someone.
Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD
Date: 2006-09-22 11:58 am (UTC)have you ever read dan rebello's "1956 and all that"? it's about the kitchen sink moment in theatre esp., and how it swept in after noel coward and "changed everything" --- i think it's REALLY REALLY fascinating on the pro and con of these various issues
it even sort of jigsaws in w.the brady-hindley stuff -- maybe i should write something abt it one day
:(
Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD
Date: 2006-09-22 11:54 am (UTC)obv xhuxk's eternal tuff question "YES BUT HOW DOES THIS MAKE THEM ROCK HARDER" still obtains, but i think it goes some way to explaining the fondness many of us have for them
(worth noting maybe: as of 1986 neither psb or morrissey were OUT, and PSB were getting a LOT of flak for it from the activists) (haha not so much morrissey as there was a "you can keep him" sentiment possibly!)
Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD
Date: 2006-09-22 11:57 am (UTC)Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD
Date: 2006-09-22 12:00 pm (UTC)Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD
Date: 2006-09-22 12:05 pm (UTC)i have not read that book but it looks interesting!
Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD
Date: 2006-09-22 12:11 pm (UTC)Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD
Date: 2006-09-22 12:14 pm (UTC)