[identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists
ok usually when i do this kind of thing i frame the question fast and badly (or i wd never frame it at all) and [livejournal.com profile] koganbot becomes testy towards my fuzziness

but here is MY "explanation" of morrissey = he brought something to the boywing of britrock = called CAMP -- as in polari, as in an angry bitchy code against the UNSTYLISH USELESSNESS of the STRAIGHTS -- except that, since he wz militantly coy abt his sexuality (korrektly, as "coming out" would have stripped a powerful ambiguity out of what he wz doin), his camp was developed as a kind of MALE HET camp...

ANYWAY -- i have always bin ambivalent abt camp as an attitude (it's quickwitted and funny but it's also a compensatory attitude adopted by those who take themselves to be victims and are sniping secretly back...)

and given the shifts since the mid-80s in fashions in sexuality and within sexuality blah blah, i think morrissey's STYLE (sex! yes! but not for me...) reveals itself as a lot more reactionary a-and larkinesque than it did at the time

(again i feel i have not got at the nubbin of what i'm on about but have at it anyway)

Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD

Date: 2006-09-22 11:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alexmacpherson.livejournal.com
I was going to post here yesterday but work and then the server crashing intervened.

I am really really really REALLY REALLY REALLY not down with het men being camp. It never transcends the pantomime level of affecation, and in my experience most het blokes who've dabbled in androgyny and camp seem to have used it as an excuse to be even more massive misogynists than other men. There's also this element of "I am too ugly and weird to get girls so...I know! I will pretend that I don't want girls!" to it, except they don't want boys either, and it's just so self-deluding and self-denying and wrong-headed. There is also, you know, get yr fucking grubby indie hands off OUR dressing-up clothes, from the gay perspective.

Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD

Date: 2006-09-22 11:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alexmacpherson.livejournal.com
Yes, camp in gay men doesn't appeal either, for exactly those reasons, but at least there are reasons, a sense of history, a communal humour and so on.

"Girls like the Smiths" = "girls have terrible terrible taste in men"! It is the same thing as girls nowadays going crazy for Bright Eyes or someone.

Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD

Date: 2006-09-22 11:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alexmacpherson.livejournal.com
Haha but hadn't PSB already released 'It's A Sin'??? What did the activists THINK that was about?!

Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD

Date: 2006-09-22 12:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alexmacpherson.livejournal.com
"everything i long to do/no matter when or where or who" ===> how is this remotely coded! ah 80s militants and your need for STRAIGHT TALKING.

i have not read that book but it looks interesting!

Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD

Date: 2006-09-22 12:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com
I do not know when I realised N Tennant was gay but it was well after hearing and liking It's A Sin. (admittedly also well before him actually coming out)

Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD

Date: 2006-09-22 11:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com
The people who found them offensive and irritating weren't ESPECIALLY socially clued-in or beautiful by the way.

But in general the point is the if you buy into certain ideas of social acceptability, non-retardation, attractiveness, cool, glamour etc. you may well react negatively to people who don't fit those ideas REPEATEDLY and LOUDLY mocking or - worse! - claiming them. It's like how one deep root of slim people's dislike of fat people is the fact that the slim people have often had to work quite hard to be that way and so people flaunting their obvious lack of this body-work-ethic is in some way mocking.

"Your value system is kind of silly" is and always has/will be a devastating critique IF you can do it convincingly and from a position of strength.

i.e. only insecure people hated the Smiths!

(except much as I would have loved this analysis as a Smiths fan and wanted to believe it it wasn't entirely true. There was something genuinely quite annoying about Morrissey in particular - crystallised by the "pinched" comment above I think. The value system he proposed wasnt a glorious polysexual widening of everything but something far creepier and more limited.)

Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD

Date: 2006-09-22 11:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com
And yet still MAGNETICALLY APPEALING (partly cos so many Smiths fans wanted to fuck* Morrissey!)

*erm, ok, hug**

**google image search "Morrissey Wolverhampton 1989" if you dare; I do not.

Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD

Date: 2006-09-22 11:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alexmacpherson.livejournal.com
to me the whole social retard thing is that most people have experienced it, and then grew out of it/stopped worrying about whatever faux pas they still made/JUST STOPPED WORRYING FULL STOP quite naturally because of that process known as GROWING UP - there is something v juvenile about the Smiths. The angsty music I tended to like - Amos, Harvey, Love et al - tended to be very self-dramatising, strong, cathartic, and they didn't wallow in it so much as try to exorcise it; whereas the Smiths' angst was a low-grade, general chronic one, they weren't possessed by demons or particularly tortured, they were just a bit narked at not getting laid.

Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD

Date: 2006-09-22 12:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com
Yeah, there's a huge Peter Pan element to Morrissey which is very offputting.

That said there's also a big self-mocking element (or there was back then more so) and some of the stuff the Smiths sang to - shyness for instance - is not an exclusively adolescent condition.

The brand of angsty music you mention I tend to find insufferably hectoring so maybe there's a big gulf of taste too!

Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD

Date: 2006-09-22 12:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com
My favourite Smiths songs as a teen were never the really bleak ones, except when I was working through a spectacularly pointless crush, instead they were the later ones - "Ask", "The Queen Is Dead", "A Rush And A Push", "Rubber Ring", and early solo Moz like "Everyday Is Like Sunday" and "Disappointed", where the perspective of the singer includes a sense of his own lameness as well as a promise of strength. These are also the 'funny' ones I guess.

Re: REPOSTED FROM ORIGINAL PAZZ & JOP THREAD

Date: 2006-09-22 03:50 pm (UTC)
koganbot: (Default)
From: [personal profile] koganbot
Potential theoretical defense of Smith's stance contained in the unintended take-down of Cheyenne Kimball that begins here.

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 6th, 2026 10:40 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios