[identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists
i. ok so out of "scholarly diligence" i watched the repeated omnibus about syd b last night
ii. and confirmed that barrett-era PF = post-barrett PF = post-PF barrett = ALL AS USELESS AS ONE ANOTHER
iii. except then i slept and dremt ALL NIGHT dreams soundtracked by barrett songs >:(

so this raises the deep poptimist question: is a tune that sticks in yr mind GOOD even if you HATE IT -- isn't the craft of melody a kind of nerve-glue to attach you to a ahem "work" so that yr feelings of some particular moment get externalised into it and there replayed?

anyway i am quite happy to grant that SB had an unusual facility with oddly shaped song-flow, burden and refrain* -- except i think i would also argue that the collective direction of the outfit he founded was increasingly at odds with this gift (cf also curtis and JD-NO)... they were fashioning a monumental high-volume drone juggernaut; his gift was quirkily quaint'Nquiet little broke-back ditties -- and that the split (as with joy div) was inevitable on musical grounds; the psycho-chemical context a pretext for sentimentalists and clueless romantics

ps the documentary itself was incredibly lame and lazy in almost every regard

Date: 2006-07-28 10:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/xyzzzz__/
oops its a full-stop no ? mark there in my last sentence.

Date: 2006-07-28 11:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com
I think it's more that "high volume drone juggernaut" isn't a great descriptor of PF from about 69 on!

Date: 2006-07-28 11:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com
(for one thing it sounds GREBT)

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 24th, 2025 03:05 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios