the BADCRAP BARFS more like
Jul. 28th, 2006 10:41 ami. ok so out of "scholarly diligence" i watched the repeated omnibus about syd b last night
ii. and confirmed that barrett-era PF = post-barrett PF = post-PF barrett = ALL AS USELESS AS ONE ANOTHER
iii. except then i slept and dremt ALL NIGHT dreams soundtracked by barrett songs >:(
so this raises the deep poptimist question: is a tune that sticks in yr mind GOOD even if you HATE IT -- isn't the craft of melody a kind of nerve-glue to attach you to a ahem "work" so that yr feelings of some particular moment get externalised into it and there replayed?
anyway i am quite happy to grant that SB had an unusual facility with oddly shaped song-flow, burden and refrain* -- except i think i would also argue that the collective direction of the outfit he founded was increasingly at odds with this gift (cf also curtis and JD-NO)... they were fashioning a monumental high-volume drone juggernaut; his gift was quirkily quaint'Nquiet little broke-back ditties -- and that the split (as with joy div) was inevitable on musical grounds; the psycho-chemical context a pretext for sentimentalists and clueless romantics
ps the documentary itself was incredibly lame and lazy in almost every regard
ii. and confirmed that barrett-era PF = post-barrett PF = post-PF barrett = ALL AS USELESS AS ONE ANOTHER
iii. except then i slept and dremt ALL NIGHT dreams soundtracked by barrett songs >:(
so this raises the deep poptimist question: is a tune that sticks in yr mind GOOD even if you HATE IT -- isn't the craft of melody a kind of nerve-glue to attach you to a ahem "work" so that yr feelings of some particular moment get externalised into it and there replayed?
anyway i am quite happy to grant that SB had an unusual facility with oddly shaped song-flow, burden and refrain* -- except i think i would also argue that the collective direction of the outfit he founded was increasingly at odds with this gift (cf also curtis and JD-NO)... they were fashioning a monumental high-volume drone juggernaut; his gift was quirkily quaint'Nquiet little broke-back ditties -- and that the split (as with joy div) was inevitable on musical grounds; the psycho-chemical context a pretext for sentimentalists and clueless romantics
ps the documentary itself was incredibly lame and lazy in almost every regard
no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 10:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 10:06 am (UTC)This morning I woke up with Jon Secada's Just Another Day Without You.
It's still in my head! I have not heard this song for approximately 8 years! Does this mean it is a good song?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:the legacy
Date: 2006-07-28 10:12 am (UTC)but to examine the (yuk) "inflewence": graham "ug" COXON and rybyn :"gah!" HYTCHCYCK is BY NO MEANS GOOD ENUFF ye pitiful L4YM0Rz
no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 10:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 10:28 am (UTC)i wake up with little 5 second Morton Feldman riffs?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:When Choons Turn BAD
Date: 2006-07-28 10:47 am (UTC)[* cf: 'catch' the flu, 'catch' deadly bubonic plague, 'catch' 22, et al.]
no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 11:24 am (UTC)Songs that always get stuck in my head FOREVER:
1. Teardrops by Womack and Womack
2. One Nation Under A Groove
3. Automatic by The Pointer Sisters
4. Love is Contaaaaaaaa-jus by Taja Sevelle
It's easy (well, not easy, but you know what I mean) enough to write a catchy melody. Advertisers do it all the time. But as much as they tend to stick in my head afterwards, they don't tend to come to mean anything to me. Songs are different, I know, because generally they're not extolling the virtues of Charnock Richard Cycles but something a bit closer to the human condition, but catchiness is the work of the artisan and not the artist.
I think.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-28 11:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
From: