Let's pause a moment to reflect on Now 57, which saw our second ever 100% vote - for "Toxic" - and also the highest ever percentage score for a non-winner ("Milkshake"). We will not see its like again. Probably.
And now for Now 58 - also packed with fine tracks, with attention surely resting onthe debut of Kristian Leontiou the SONG THAT BROKE THE INTERWEB, Outkast's "Ha Yeah". Included somewhat late on this Now poll, which otherwise celebrates the summer of '94. Let's see what you think about it.
[Poll #771642]
TICK ME.
And now for Now 58 - also packed with fine tracks, with attention surely resting on
[Poll #771642]
TICK ME.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 01:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 01:13 pm (UTC)The bi-product of this might be a Kelis victory, ironically. Still, this is shaping up to be another clash of the titans!
no subject
Date: 2006-07-17 01:14 pm (UTC)GOOD
Date: 2006-07-17 01:16 pm (UTC)I think 'Hey Ya' is v good but am also prepared to withdraw my vote for it because it is nowhere near even the top 10 best songs on this.
Re: GOOD
Date: 2006-07-17 01:18 pm (UTC)IT'S NOT RACIST TO UNTICK HEY YA!
Re: GOOD
Date: 2006-07-17 01:19 pm (UTC)Re: GOOD
Date: 2006-07-17 01:23 pm (UTC)Are Outkast innovative? Their sound/perspective/etc. seemed quite fresh to me. The particular argt that rubbed people the wrong way in 03 though was using Outkast's - or specifically Andre 3000's - particular innovations as a way of dismissing or downplaying everything else in hip-hop. You can call something innovative without implying that it's a set of innovations that other workers in the genre should try and follow.
That said it's odd that more groups haven't tried to make a "Hey Ya!".
It is virtually impossible now to get any cash for a copy of Speakerboxxx/The Love Below, by the way.
Re: GOOD
Date: 2006-07-17 01:27 pm (UTC)I can't believe I actually own S/TLB - the reason I have not tried to sell it is because I do not know where it is.
Re: GOOD
Date: 2006-07-17 01:29 pm (UTC)Re: GOOD
Date: 2006-07-17 01:33 pm (UTC)Re: GOOD
Date: 2006-07-17 01:34 pm (UTC)Re: GOOD
From:Re: GOOD
From:Re: GOOD
Date: 2006-07-17 01:30 pm (UTC)Re: GOOD
Date: 2006-07-17 01:31 pm (UTC)Re: GOOD
Date: 2006-07-17 01:37 pm (UTC)Re: GOOD
From:Re: GOOD
Date: 2006-07-17 01:30 pm (UTC)Re: GOOD
Date: 2006-07-17 01:30 pm (UTC)some people thought this BEFORE 'Stankonia' you know. not me tho really but only because i'd only heard their singles up to that point (which always WERE actually quite novel and scintillating - esp. the druggy 'Elevators' - to the extent that they had not managed to break into UK charts prior to 'B.O.B.' strangely and sadly)
Re: GOOD
Date: 2006-07-17 01:32 pm (UTC)Anything but "Some Girls"
Date: 2006-07-17 03:11 pm (UTC)Re: Anything but "Some Girls"
Date: 2006-07-17 03:32 pm (UTC)Re: Anything but "Some Girls"
Date: 2006-07-17 04:16 pm (UTC)Re: Anything but "Some Girls"
Date: 2006-07-17 04:21 pm (UTC)The Show is the best GA track but there's still LOVE MACHINE to come, surely a potential winner if ever there was one?
Re: Anything but "Some Girls"
Date: 2006-07-17 05:16 pm (UTC)'Love Machine' should surely win, competition pending? It seems that the Poptimist tendency is to rate the big chorus over the weird sounds, and 'Love Machine' has maybe the biggest chorus evah.
Re: Anything but "Some Girls"
Date: 2006-07-17 05:31 pm (UTC)Re: Anything but "Some Girls"
Date: 2006-07-17 05:40 pm (UTC)I find it hard to believe that Rachel isn't scoring higher. People are thinking too hard and not sticking by their "any good at all" guns.
Re: Anything but "Some Girls"
Date: 2006-07-17 07:45 pm (UTC)Re: Anything but "Some Girls"
From:Re: Anything but "Some Girls"
From:Re: Anything but "Some Girls"
From: