It's good enough that I would actually type it up, but I only have that Greatest Hits on cassette and god only knows where any of my old cassettes currently reside (apart from my Whigfield album which is on my windowsill)
I've never really read *any* Burchill (including the liner notes, even though I HAVE the album) except for the Paglia-baiting piece, which was like...uh...aim high, I guess?
I don't really know much about Burchill's pre-90s stuff - she alludes to it all the time in all her columns but for obvious reasons I am never entirely sure whether she is joking/lying/has forgotten/&c.
she pretty much FOUNDED anti-rockism w/o ever calling it that -- this is 78-81-ish i guess
her early and angry disenchantment with punk and its co-optation was groundbreaking; she wz never interested in post-punk or proto indie really --- charts, motown, girls, these were her beats
she is a great stylist and a world-historical evil!! i doubt much of her writing stands up, though some of her singles columns might
This explains a lot of the things she refers to! I always wondered why she never got referred to even obliquely in uh 'popist' discourse when, from what I read of her, she was a PURE popist.
She's an amazing stylist - she always makes me think I'd like to agree with her even when the views she is expounding are completely nuts.
v. is there a collection of her '78-'81 writings or maybe the modern review stuff.
I know she was very critical of 'england's dreaming'. Caugh a clip of Savage on TV saying something like 'why isn't she here to defend her review of my book?' when someone else showed up.
vi. has anyone read 'sugar rush' the book? maybe her take on pop, etc. is in there even if it might not end up to much as a novel..
haha because THEORY - for all that it can be anti-rockist - is v much anti-popist! I can imagine word-for-word the Burchill argument against theory (some of those words would no doubt be "working class heroes like my dead dad never needed it"). I wonder what S Reynolds actually thinks of her.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 01:15 pm (UTC)You might well be right.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 01:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 01:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 01:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 01:35 pm (UTC)i have never read ANY Burchill piece on music!
no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 01:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 01:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 05:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 01:42 pm (UTC)her early and angry disenchantment with punk and its co-optation was groundbreaking; she wz never interested in post-punk or proto indie really --- charts, motown, girls, these were her beats
she is a great stylist and a world-historical evil!! i doubt much of her writing stands up, though some of her singles columns might
no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 01:45 pm (UTC)She's an amazing stylist - she always makes me think I'd like to agree with her even when the views she is expounding are completely nuts.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 01:48 pm (UTC)i. she is 1xgurl
ii. somewhat dodgy politix
iii. no interest at all in THEORY
no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 01:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-10 12:05 pm (UTC)I know she was very critical of 'england's dreaming'. Caugh a clip of Savage on TV saying something like 'why isn't she here to defend her review of my book?' when someone else showed up.
vi. has anyone read 'sugar rush' the book? maybe her take on pop, etc. is in there even if it might not end up to much as a novel..
no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 01:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 01:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 01:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 02:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-09 02:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-10 11:25 am (UTC)