(188 comments)
Jun. 6th, 2006 12:08 pmThe recent Now polls have been total blockbusters in terms of comments - and lots of votes too. This runs us up against the technical limits of LJ, i.e. that an over-50 comments thread is a chore to read, and a 2-page one requires particular dedication even beyond that. Not much we can do about that, other than pass the thematic ball forward more often (i.e. start new threads).
So why's it happening? Well Poptimists is bigger now, and this is a period we all remember, and a lot of us were online then and fighting various crucial ideological pop battles (ahem) and so there's an urge to either defend territory hard-won - or complicate history by asking questions which Pop Fervour made us less likely to pose at the time.
It's interesting* that there's a definite hard kernel of a 00s Pop Canon there - after poll after poll with winning scores in the 70s, Britney, Kylie, S Club, Destiny's all post scores of 90%-ish, and I can think of a few more tracks that are likely to do similar. (Obviously a lot of this is a quirk of demographics - we've set up a community where ppl who like that sort of thing can wander in.)
*especially cos of the relative lack of majority-votes and high-scorers for the current month polls stevem runs - has pop got worse, or just more diverse?
So why's it happening? Well Poptimists is bigger now, and this is a period we all remember, and a lot of us were online then and fighting various crucial ideological pop battles (ahem) and so there's an urge to either defend territory hard-won - or complicate history by asking questions which Pop Fervour made us less likely to pose at the time.
It's interesting* that there's a definite hard kernel of a 00s Pop Canon there - after poll after poll with winning scores in the 70s, Britney, Kylie, S Club, Destiny's all post scores of 90%-ish, and I can think of a few more tracks that are likely to do similar. (Obviously a lot of this is a quirk of demographics - we've set up a community where ppl who like that sort of thing can wander in.)
*especially cos of the relative lack of majority-votes and high-scorers for the current month polls stevem runs - has pop got worse, or just more diverse?
no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 12:46 pm (UTC)My vague ray of hope for the current state of play not lasting has to do with how exciting and forward-thinking dance music has been for the past few years - when this starts to filter into pop (a process which always takes a few years with dance, because there's no chart-hunger in the genre at all) (and it arguably is already: I hear 'Body Language' by Booka Shade all the time these days in the most unexpected places; Body Language by Kylie was the first minimal house/pop crossover album; even hip-hop is going minimal, stuff like the new LL/J-Lo is virtually minimal techno) - anyway yes, when this starts to flter into pop in the same way that 2-step infected pop to the extent that Liberty X scored unexpected No 1s by using it as a template, then things will Get Good again.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 12:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 12:55 pm (UTC)My other reason for thinking this = Madonna. Confessions is a flawed album BUT the people and the scene she's aligning herself with are incredibly significant. At a time when house and techno are seen as completely irrelevant to pop in two major pop markets - the US, where hip-hop has taken dance's place, and the UK, where sadly indie has - the world's biggest pop star, one of the few pop stars who can afford to buck trends, has chosen to align herself with neither of those genres but with dance.
And with some pretty fucking leftfield dance producers too - eg choosing Tiefschwarz and James Holden to remix her new single. As ever Madge is not the one creating the forward-thinking sounds but she is taking them to the mainstream in a way that eg GA, Rachel cannot - and where Madge leads (and also succeeds) others will follow.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 12:59 pm (UTC)re. the forward-thinkingness of Madonna - hmmm, thing is her biggest smash for a grillion years is founded on an, erm, ABBA SAMPLE.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 01:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 01:11 pm (UTC)(Though as my tickys this month indicate he sort of did for me)
no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 01:18 pm (UTC)Also the Eric Prydzs and Shapeshifters of this world aren't pop stars in the way Madonna is!
no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 01:28 pm (UTC)I think as you mentioned before "Slow" and the Kylie album were much more of a pointer to an unfilled niche - that got a lot of stuff right, it just didn't have many or any good hooks, and the settings exposed Kylie's voice as kind of awful.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 01:42 pm (UTC)(And 'being in touch with the dancefloors' has nearly always been part of Madonna's thing, so she's kind of a special case.)
no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 01:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 04:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 05:04 pm (UTC)- the difference between boshing high street house and trendy minimal house is small enough to be entirely erased in the transition overground, so prepare for disappointment!
(I think househeads sometimes overestimate the potential for micro-shifts in underground house to somehow change the face of mainstream dance music, which isn't to say it CAN'T happen but I don't think the Madonna record will have had much to do with it)
no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 05:08 pm (UTC)Over here it's kind of a two-pronged attack because it's coming up through the indie as well - Justice, Ed Banger, Feadz and our old friend Mr Oizo are quite rock-based, and with various indie groups (eg Test Icicles) working closely with them who knows what will result? And Uffie's 'Ready To Uff' is exactly the kind of novelty white-girl hip-hop I can imagine gatecrashing the charts..
no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 05:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 05:14 pm (UTC)'Pop The Glock' also OK but would be better if it sampled 'Sweet Dreams' outright rather than puttering around the riff.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 05:17 pm (UTC)Did you ever hear Northern State?
no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 05:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 01:22 pm (UTC)This is why I like it!
no subject
Date: 2006-06-06 01:23 pm (UTC)