When Britain refused to listen
May. 31st, 2006 01:50 pm'Not heard it' is one of the more common comments read when the Top 40 polls are posted. Which is perhaps the most unsatisfying answer that can be given. Lots of people can say they've heard every single in the Top 40, provided they'd listened to JK & Joel that particular week. Although they may not necessarily remember all of them the next day...
But, if you 'haven't heard it', bloody why not?! I personally stopped listening to the Top 40 countdown in full around the same time as I started University - some ten years ago now. As you grow up it seems life gets more and more in the way, preventing you from having the same ease of control you may have previously enjoyed when it comes to making choices as a young viewer or listener. So far so obvious, and it seems this is the real reason why the Poptimists electorate are often at a loss to decide whether a recent Top 40 hit is good or bad based on how it sounds. There are other factors too such as the nature in which media has changed since then - dedicated music video channels, t'internet (esp. portals/filters/resources such as youtube and itunes) and downloading facilities...all things intended to make the pursuit of hearing music easier. But, it's not really working that well is it? At least, not for 'people old enough to know better' who seem to be ageing faster than the technology is progressing, and that's pretty terrifyingly fast. It's all too much. But, really, aren't these just excuses? Is this sort of reasoning good enough? Should we take it as a given that the charts are reasonably constant in terms of quality (regardless of the ebb and flow of sales figures)? Should a Poptimist be putting more effort in? It's not meant to be a chore after all.
I'm interested in any serious views people may have about the whole thing, so the question(s) be as follows:
What is your current attitude to pop (however you define it) and new music? Are you keen to hear as much of it as you can or do you prefer to revel in nostalgia (or perhaps some healthy balance of both)? Where do you turn to, specifically, now to find out about new music anyway? If you DO know every song in the top 40 any given week does this just make you a Chart Geek rather than a Pop Lover now? Do you even care about music or are you just one of those disgusting poll-fetishists I've heard about?
EH?
But, if you 'haven't heard it', bloody why not?! I personally stopped listening to the Top 40 countdown in full around the same time as I started University - some ten years ago now. As you grow up it seems life gets more and more in the way, preventing you from having the same ease of control you may have previously enjoyed when it comes to making choices as a young viewer or listener. So far so obvious, and it seems this is the real reason why the Poptimists electorate are often at a loss to decide whether a recent Top 40 hit is good or bad based on how it sounds. There are other factors too such as the nature in which media has changed since then - dedicated music video channels, t'internet (esp. portals/filters/resources such as youtube and itunes) and downloading facilities...all things intended to make the pursuit of hearing music easier. But, it's not really working that well is it? At least, not for 'people old enough to know better' who seem to be ageing faster than the technology is progressing, and that's pretty terrifyingly fast. It's all too much. But, really, aren't these just excuses? Is this sort of reasoning good enough? Should we take it as a given that the charts are reasonably constant in terms of quality (regardless of the ebb and flow of sales figures)? Should a Poptimist be putting more effort in? It's not meant to be a chore after all.
I'm interested in any serious views people may have about the whole thing, so the question(s) be as follows:
What is your current attitude to pop (however you define it) and new music? Are you keen to hear as much of it as you can or do you prefer to revel in nostalgia (or perhaps some healthy balance of both)? Where do you turn to, specifically, now to find out about new music anyway? If you DO know every song in the top 40 any given week does this just make you a Chart Geek rather than a Pop Lover now? Do you even care about music or are you just one of those disgusting poll-fetishists I've heard about?
EH?
I BLAME THE ABSENCE OF POPTIMISM
Date: 2006-05-31 01:21 pm (UTC)i have a huge massive giant deferral problem...
Date: 2006-05-31 01:21 pm (UTC)I AM HEGEL IT SUX :(
no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 01:23 pm (UTC)- since working in an office where we have the radio on my urge to chase down and hear new chartpop has dwindled, because I hear a lot anyway but (as I keep saying) the fvcking DJs never tell you what anything is nowadays.
- WRT video channels, youtube etc, I am a very non-visual person I think, for whatever reason I just don't pay much attention to videos. I don't think I've ever followed a link to a video, I just wait for the MP3 instead. This makes me a very non-typical pop consumer, even more so than age/gender/buying habits might.
more dialectical mentalism
Date: 2006-05-31 01:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 01:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 01:28 pm (UTC)Also, I guess, a lot of poptimists listens to tonnes'o exciting new music - from microhouse to indie to folk or whatever - that never gets within a sniff of the charts.
Also the freeview pop channels - Ver Hits and TMF - seem to present a pretty skewed view of what is actually in the charts. I imagine they are both heavily riddled w/payola. (Actually E4 music may be the best - but it seems to have been replaced for live streaming of BB).
no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 01:32 pm (UTC)Ding ding ding!
no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 01:38 pm (UTC)- no internet
Those are the basic reasons, as they're the places where I used to be able to keep up (I never listen to the radio anyway). BUT ever since the top 40 went completely irrelevant (which I trace back to Will S stopping the top 40 columns - also the internationalism of the jukebox hasn't helped) it's become quite hard to track what actually gets in it and mop up any interesting-looking ones which had passed me by.
The reasons which have cropped up in the past few months which probably mean that even with internet and TV I'd find it hard to keep up with the charts:
- spending all the time I do allocate to tracking stuff down on hott new electrohouse bobbins
- am on more and more PR mailing lists and even cursory listens to new stuff are hard to fit in
- since CD singles became more or less irrelevant it seems that the amount of interesting-looking stuff in the charts has also diminished somewhat
- also since the Britrock revival
Narrow playlists
Date: 2006-05-31 01:39 pm (UTC)Radio stations don't have huge playlists either so unless you listen lots you'll miss out too.
Plus - the interwebs have made it much easier to listen to all kinds of new music from all over the world, much of which never gets anywhere near the chart. Thanks to that I feel like I'm in the rather off position of listening to more new music now than I ever have done in my life and yet still end up knowing less of the chart than ever - and it's not that my tastes are significantly less pop, just that UK chart pop is a decreasing proportion of the total pop I get to hear.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 01:39 pm (UTC)My notion of poptimism does not revolve around a slavish devotion to fashion, and I have a deeply conflicted position with regard to contemporary opinion and popular culture -- I tend to react against it, while being aware that it's not exactly wrong. I will not apologise for it, since this seems to me to replicate patterns of response to something like the public realm of chatter found in almost all of the modern (i.e. post-romantic, i.e. post-Rousseau) intellectuals I admire.
I don't watch much TV and we only have free video channels and I hate adverts so tend to turn them off; I often see videos on MTV in the gym but I would rather listen to my ipod there so can't always connect music to pictures (this happened with the Fallout Boy single).
I think the idea -- which I think you're half joking about -- that we all ought to be obliged to spend 'enough' time chasing the cultural forth of capital is insane and deeply unpleasant; I'm repeating myself I know, but I take poptimism to be as applicable to someone who only listens to 70s prog rock or only likes hair metal and Mozart, as it is to someone who gets all indie about the charts. The cult of the new, the attempt to be 'with it', 'up with the latest trends', 'down with the scene' etc. seems to me a bit wearing. One of the good things about the web communities I've interacted with is the way they generate their own cultural world based on a combination of new and old things. The polls presumably build in to this, but I see them more as an excuse for a natter than anything in themselves. (Heresy! I've never been as into lists and formulae as
no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 01:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 01:43 pm (UTC)Once we finish the Now polls I'm toying with using the format for Virgin's "Best...Ever" albums which would allow us windows onto more specific genres.
Re: I BLAME THE ABSENCE OF POPTIMISM
Date: 2006-05-31 01:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 01:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 01:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 01:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 01:49 pm (UTC)i guess the charts reflect something a little different to the ethos behind poptimists i.e. there's a lot of indie-rock about at the moment. of course in practice poptimists is more partial to this than it may like to admit but you know, reputation to uphold and all that...
Re: I BLAME THE ABSENCE OF POPTIMISM
Date: 2006-05-31 01:50 pm (UTC)i blame MILBURN entirely for this state of affairs, i used to pay attention when bands had good names.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 01:51 pm (UTC)Actually it's just moving video that distracts me - sleeves, photos, fonts, logos etc. all add to the buzz. Though not so much as for a lot of people - I'm very comfortable with the disembodied MP3.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 01:52 pm (UTC)L4M4CQ CAN SVCK MY C0CK TILL I CVM BL00D
Date: 2006-05-31 01:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 01:52 pm (UTC)Re: Narrow playlists
Date: 2006-05-31 01:54 pm (UTC)very good point. the Uk charts ARE still reasonably diverse i think, but we're all more aware now of the broader range of stuff out there and it's commercial potential (or potential in other areas?).