the lex just claimed this: is he korrekt?
my response = it is NOT COMMON CERTAINLY but it has happened, like a kind of harmonic convergence within recorded music after -- with things after never the same as before
for example:
i. stones
ii. sabbaf
iii. slade/pistols (=essentially the same thing anyway)
iv. pulp fiction inspired resurgence of SURF sound
obv plenty of bands have been one then the other but not simultaneously, and some have even switched back again
*note use of ACTUAL here must not be employed in any kind of essentialist slipperiness, bcz that kind of behaviour is INDIE
my response = it is NOT COMMON CERTAINLY but it has happened, like a kind of harmonic convergence within recorded music after -- with things after never the same as before
for example:
i. stones
ii. sabbaf
iii. slade/pistols (=essentially the same thing anyway)
iv. pulp fiction inspired resurgence of SURF sound
obv plenty of bands have been one then the other but not simultaneously, and some have even switched back again
*note use of ACTUAL here must not be employed in any kind of essentialist slipperiness, bcz that kind of behaviour is INDIE
no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 12:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 12:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 03:42 pm (UTC)cf also freakytigger's "None of that hardcore ecstasy with LSI on it mate" motto
but it's true neither of these against ideas are wielded ON THE DANCEFLOOR
no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 06:53 pm (UTC)'Dance music people' definitely define themselves against others - the latest mixmag digs at listeners to Rhyming Slang &c. Where dance is different is that a lot of people who go out dancing don't consume by buying the records, they don't treat the music as central to their lifestyle in the same way as consumers of other genres do.