What's wrong (or right) with formula in pop? It seems to go hand in hand with the apparent 'disposability' of pop, really. I'm all for it: from Motown to, well, Lu Cont, I guess. On the other hand, I'm listening to the Coldplay remix and though I like it well enough, I do worry that JLC's just caning the same tried and tested formula again and again.
So, what do youse think? About formula? I'm sure Tom will have some stuff to say, what with all the 60s pop he's listening to for Popular. :)
So, what do youse think? About formula? I'm sure Tom will have some stuff to say, what with all the 60s pop he's listening to for Popular. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-27 01:57 pm (UTC)i think it's more like here are your tools (the various house-band musicains); here are the rules (big long list of don'ts): now do what you like
no subject
Date: 2006-01-27 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-27 02:38 pm (UTC)more complicatedly, from the "other side" == the dawn of funk blah blah -- j.brown used strings often (a 50s hangover but radicalised brown-style); and sly wz also an black-"prog" ecletician (tho also a beatles fan) (g.clinton ditto, even more so) -- what could nay SHOULD be done put pressure on BG to move beyond his own formula (plus also it fell from adult favour via early-doors rockism, and the "pop=kidstuff" ideology)
finally there wz the struggle from the singers-turned-auteurs: stevie wonder stayed in-house; gaye left -- this wz partly abt artistic control but also abt personal history i think
no subject
Date: 2006-01-27 06:46 pm (UTC)