No Spoilers
Jan. 9th, 2006 12:04 pmOne reason I don't read music reviews much: if there's something really good in a record - a lyric or moment or inflection or bit of 'punctum', whatever you like - it's tempting as a reviewer to write about that. (Right?)
But then doesn't that moment lose its impact for the person who listens having read? Or - worse maybe - gets too much emphasis or impact?
Should reviews come with spoiler warnings? Should reviewers avoid quoting particularly great lines? How do you feel when a particularly good writer infiltrates your hearing of a song?
But then doesn't that moment lose its impact for the person who listens having read? Or - worse maybe - gets too much emphasis or impact?
Should reviews come with spoiler warnings? Should reviewers avoid quoting particularly great lines? How do you feel when a particularly good writer infiltrates your hearing of a song?
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 12:33 pm (UTC)the other problem with reviewers talking of puncta, great moments etc, is that they're built up too much and there's heightened expectation, where it's always possible that the greatness of the moment came from the surprise factor in the first place (eg "I know what you're thinkin'! You been thinkin' 'bout my butt!"). (the same goes for reviews of albums in which particular songs are highlighted.)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 12:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 12:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 12:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-09 04:50 pm (UTC)eg MES & His teh Falls, MIA viz the only new albums I've heard this year like