I was gonna post this on my own LJ but it's a welcome counterpoint to that k-spunk article from yesterday, I think. The other week, I went to a symposium on the hardcore cuntinuum at the University of East London, which is WAY WAY WAY OUT EAST, Cyprus is so far out but I love the DLR so it was all good. I missed k-spunk's talk because I was interviewing Tori Amos (and tbh her academic babble is so much more preferable) but that didn't matter - I was there to support Dan Hancox and Joe Muggs and they were both excellent, v funny and incisive in debunking the cuntinuum. I don't think either has put their speech online but I was particularly pleased that Dan brought up the issue of dancing, which ~for some reason~ is rarely discussed despite the cuntinuum consisting of dance genres. ANYWAY, my friend Melissa Bradshaw (who is the kind of smart, knowledgeable writer who should be linked up all over the place, rather than fauxthorities like k-spunk and SR) was in the audience with me, murked k-spunk at one point and has now written about it, as well as comparing the symposium to the soca aerobics class she left early to go to, and a vg read it is too.
Profile
Poptimists
Page Summary
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2009-05-12 05:15 pm (UTC)We can overstress the dancing thing: yeah i think it's dumb to talk about a specific form of dance music w/out experience of the situation in which it is primarily experienced, but it'd be equally dumb to locate it only in that world and only in that instant, and to never try and see it in any wider context. S Reynolds has got carried away with one of his own ideas, and unfortunately he's establishment enough that he's carried away some others with him, and unfortunately that idea doesn't really hold any sort of water. But the act of making up a prism through which to view the world and marvelling at the funny shapes it makes is still essential.
i dunno why but while i find "hardcore cuntinuum" funny I'm uncomfortable w/ yr using "k-spunk": it seems, well, bullyish frankly although i'm sure it's not intended that way. If he's wrong, his wrongness can speak for itself.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-12 05:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-12 05:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-12 05:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-12 05:37 pm (UTC)(also surely more of a rhyme than a pun?)
no subject
Date: 2009-05-12 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-12 06:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-12 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-12 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-12 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-13 12:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-12 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-13 12:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-13 09:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-14 01:18 pm (UTC)