which gives this feeling of the whole thing as spectacle rather than as genuine conflict
Something's being a spectacle doesn't mean that the conflicts aren't genuine (e.g., Repubs vs. Dems). I think one of the mistakes people make in thinking about culture is that they assume that sharing a culture means "having" values that the members of the culture all "share." Whereas I'd say crucial features of cultures and subcultures are what people in the cultures tend to fight about. So clashes between cultures and between subcultures will often take the form of people not comprehending each other's battles, so conflicts might be over what's worth fighting about.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
Re: general response
Date: 2008-11-19 03:03 pm (UTC)Something's being a spectacle doesn't mean that the conflicts aren't genuine (e.g., Repubs vs. Dems). I think one of the mistakes people make in thinking about culture is that they assume that sharing a culture means "having" values that the members of the culture all "share." Whereas I'd say crucial features of cultures and subcultures are what people in the cultures tend to fight about. So clashes between cultures and between subcultures will often take the form of people not comprehending each other's battles, so conflicts might be over what's worth fighting about.