Brother, can you spare a DRM?
Sep. 30th, 2008 11:46 amI remember around the time of Bush getting in and the dotcom bust a few articles (that great pop seer Jim DeRogatis may have written one!) saying, ah well at least this will be good for music as recessions mean a return to grassroots creativity and proper music not this manufactured etc etc.
But on the other hand you could just as easily argue that in bad economic times music can provide a bit of escapism and fantasy - Busby Berkeley dreams and all that.
Do you have a view on the effects of economic gloom on the 'mood' of pop - the type of things that are likely to get big?
But on the other hand you could just as easily argue that in bad economic times music can provide a bit of escapism and fantasy - Busby Berkeley dreams and all that.
Do you have a view on the effects of economic gloom on the 'mood' of pop - the type of things that are likely to get big?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 10:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 11:02 am (UTC)Increased sales of 'Back To Black,' tbh, probably.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 11:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 11:07 am (UTC)"historically" economic gloom = DRESSING UP, viz teddy boys, glam, also new romantics, but i don't know if there are rly enough datapoints to "prove" this...
i think there's always so much music being made that you can use it to prove any half-arsed theory either way innit...
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 11:10 am (UTC)I wonder if there are different prevailing half-arsed theories in Britain and the US.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 11:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 11:34 am (UTC)I approach most of these macro theories with suspicion though. Critics will pay more attention to albums which seem topical, and this might make it seem like the pop culture winds are blowing one way, but really for every gloomy recession album to your right there'll be a new Pussycat Dolls opus to your left so it's a false picture.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 11:40 am (UTC)Novelty record to contrast with loadsamoney perhaps.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 11:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 11:50 am (UTC)That's all :(
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 12:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 05:14 pm (UTC)???
Date: 2008-09-30 01:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 11:38 am (UTC)I read an article along these lines just recently but can't remember where. I think I sniggered and thought "Donny Tourette".
People getting angry at Social Causes and making records about them of course doesn't necessasrily result in good records (punk 101 nyah) and in fact given the blandout across pop I'd be depressed thinking it might just result in yet more moaning - either way you look at it some energy is the key, it's whether economic gloom stomps on the energetic elements and they can't be bothered to come out.
More
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 11:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 11:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 11:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 12:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 12:20 pm (UTC)Oh hold on.
Yes I am, that is what I am.
MUST HAVE MOAR
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 11:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 02:28 pm (UTC)(Also demographics - 90s teenpop for instance was driven by the boomer-echo bump, i.e. people my little sister's age, and the Miley/Jonas wave is driven by kids-of-Gen Xers, whom logic sez will turn out to be bigger slackers than Gen X themselves.)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 05:40 am (UTC)** Former tween-aged Kenickie fan; there was more than one 1998.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 09:40 pm (UTC)AND WE HAVE LIVED THEM ALL
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:26 pm (UTC)