What makes a good best-of?
Jun. 5th, 2008 11:06 amYou don't have to read the review of the Radiohead best-of which got me thinking about this - the relevant bit is this: "This compilation is dominated by a pair of central ideas of what Radiohead sound like: emotionally nourishing, impressionistic balladeers, or crunchy, tech- and texture-savvy rockers. The outliers, moments when the band has dabbled more in mood, atmosphere, or a love of pure sound...aren't represented at all."
Now admittedly Scott's talking about the 2CD version not the 1CD version, which would have more room to roam, but my reaction was still "DUDE IT'S A BEST OF" - one of the things best ofs are for is to boil down an act to its essence, and with the best will in the world the experimental stuff has always been fringier to Radiohead than some might have you think.
But maybe you think best ofs are for representing a band's entire output, or spotlighting hidden depths, or presenting fan favourites, or or or - what do you look for in a compilation?
Now admittedly Scott's talking about the 2CD version not the 1CD version, which would have more room to roam, but my reaction was still "DUDE IT'S A BEST OF" - one of the things best ofs are for is to boil down an act to its essence, and with the best will in the world the experimental stuff has always been fringier to Radiohead than some might have you think.
But maybe you think best ofs are for representing a band's entire output, or spotlighting hidden depths, or presenting fan favourites, or or or - what do you look for in a compilation?
no subject
Date: 2008-06-05 11:13 am (UTC)For Radiohead read whoever, but that's exactly what I want from a compilation - even if I'd never liked any of a band / artist's singles, I might be interested in a best of that represented a broader spectrum. Fan favourites are the things that are easiest to find so there's less value in collecting them all together...
isn't the entire notion of a greatest hits compilation going to be outdated soon anyway?
Maybe - although maybe also the massive glut of music that's available and often a bit contextless might make it more important, this idea that an act can put together 15 songs from across 4 albums (or out of 50 tracks, depending on what happens to the concept of the album) and say, "listen to this, this is us and these are all the things we can sound like" - there's a definite starting point, rather than just downloading at random the songs with titles you like.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-05 11:28 am (UTC)