Following the Jesse McCartney discussion a few posts back, I happened upon this article over at PopMatters. I'm not quite sure what to make of it, but it's an interesting take on the early days of Disney pop.
OK, now I'm being reductive of the article itself with the "sleep with" talk, but I do wish the topic, which is a really volatile one, was given a lot more nuance.
That's why I see Dream Street as an ebb, not anything resembling a "peak" -- they may have been more specifically targeted to tweens, but it was because people in general were already moving away from the boybands, so the audience (probably) fractured a little. That's speculation, too, but it feels consistent with the lack of crossover of these artists -- many of whom were on otherwise huge labels like Jive (No Secrets was off the top of my head) -- had after 2001.
But then again, the A*Teens were pretty huge at Radio Disney (and sold more than Dream Street, I bet) by catering to a more narrow audience range. But I still think you can chalk it up a lot more to novelty appeal than sexual appeal.
Dream Street: Big in Japan?
Date: 2008-05-28 11:13 pm (UTC)That's why I see Dream Street as an ebb, not anything resembling a "peak" -- they may have been more specifically targeted to tweens, but it was because people in general were already moving away from the boybands, so the audience (probably) fractured a little. That's speculation, too, but it feels consistent with the lack of crossover of these artists -- many of whom were on otherwise huge labels like Jive (No Secrets was off the top of my head) -- had after 2001.
But then again, the A*Teens were pretty huge at Radio Disney (and sold more than Dream Street, I bet) by catering to a more narrow audience range. But I still think you can chalk it up a lot more to novelty appeal than sexual appeal.