Soul vs Technique
Apr. 11th, 2008 11:26 amI hope he won't mind me quoting him, but I read an interesting assertion in Alex's review of the new Mariah album (today's Guardian):
"Carey's voice has been mocked, bizarrely, as being a triumph of technique over soul - an argument that fails to comprehend that technique and soul are intertwined, that technique primarily exists as a means to convey emotion".
I thought this would be a good discussion to have here - it's a point I quite strongly disagree with (generally, not specifically with relation to Mariah), but I'll wait to see if anyone is interested in commenting before launching into it.
"Carey's voice has been mocked, bizarrely, as being a triumph of technique over soul - an argument that fails to comprehend that technique and soul are intertwined, that technique primarily exists as a means to convey emotion".
I thought this would be a good discussion to have here - it's a point I quite strongly disagree with (generally, not specifically with relation to Mariah), but I'll wait to see if anyone is interested in commenting before launching into it.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-12 04:26 am (UTC)But I guess my point here (if there is one) is that even though I think this argument is interesting, I just can't connect the common argument originating in the early 90's with what she's actually doing now. It kind of seems like a moot point to drag it back out! When she goes giddy on her new one, it sounds almost like a production trick, like Britney octave-jumping or something -- it isn't a naked swan dive off of a cliff.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-12 04:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-12 04:57 am (UTC)