Soul vs Technique
Apr. 11th, 2008 11:26 amI hope he won't mind me quoting him, but I read an interesting assertion in Alex's review of the new Mariah album (today's Guardian):
"Carey's voice has been mocked, bizarrely, as being a triumph of technique over soul - an argument that fails to comprehend that technique and soul are intertwined, that technique primarily exists as a means to convey emotion".
I thought this would be a good discussion to have here - it's a point I quite strongly disagree with (generally, not specifically with relation to Mariah), but I'll wait to see if anyone is interested in commenting before launching into it.
"Carey's voice has been mocked, bizarrely, as being a triumph of technique over soul - an argument that fails to comprehend that technique and soul are intertwined, that technique primarily exists as a means to convey emotion".
I thought this would be a good discussion to have here - it's a point I quite strongly disagree with (generally, not specifically with relation to Mariah), but I'll wait to see if anyone is interested in commenting before launching into it.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-11 11:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-11 11:47 am (UTC)you can't separate the issue of technique from the issue of musicality-as-expression -- what i'm objecting to is the easyread version of what technique is and isn't (as sean says, virtuosity might be a better word, except i think it has the "empty technique" gene in-built these days) combined with the easyread version of how expressivity works (or should work) in music...