Soul vs Technique
Apr. 11th, 2008 11:26 amI hope he won't mind me quoting him, but I read an interesting assertion in Alex's review of the new Mariah album (today's Guardian):
"Carey's voice has been mocked, bizarrely, as being a triumph of technique over soul - an argument that fails to comprehend that technique and soul are intertwined, that technique primarily exists as a means to convey emotion".
I thought this would be a good discussion to have here - it's a point I quite strongly disagree with (generally, not specifically with relation to Mariah), but I'll wait to see if anyone is interested in commenting before launching into it.
"Carey's voice has been mocked, bizarrely, as being a triumph of technique over soul - an argument that fails to comprehend that technique and soul are intertwined, that technique primarily exists as a means to convey emotion".
I thought this would be a good discussion to have here - it's a point I quite strongly disagree with (generally, not specifically with relation to Mariah), but I'll wait to see if anyone is interested in commenting before launching into it.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-11 10:52 am (UTC)this is an aesthetic very sharply at odds with rock's come-as-you-are vocal aesthetic -- which derives primarily from dylan's refiguring of folk styles, and somewhat from white euro misgrasp of blues technique
it's also more complicated by the shift from religious to secular (gospel --> soul) where i think tensions and contradictions flood in (but they are also part of the point: the expressive excitement, if you like) (this tension is probably most obvious with gay disco passion divas, where the submissiveness to the lord has become a submissive to sexual desire)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-11 10:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-11 01:53 pm (UTC)