Imitation And Limitation
Feb. 19th, 2008 11:39 amDuring yesterday's DUFFY DUST-UP, there was a bit of talk about whether it matters if someone is riding on the market coat-tails of someone else.
datura800 and
girlboymusic both said things to the effect of "well that's just how the industry works, it's hardly a surprise". And I can see their point - when boy bands and girl groups are big, pop fans look for the elements that make each boy band interesting, rather than dismiss them a priori as a market response.
I'd like to take the debate wider and ask - when do you and don't you mind imitation and bandwagon jumping? Are the originals always the best? Does it make a difference when the trend (as with the Winehouse one) also has a relationship to much older music? What are some of the most blatant rip-offs you've enjoyed?
I'd like to take the debate wider and ask - when do you and don't you mind imitation and bandwagon jumping? Are the originals always the best? Does it make a difference when the trend (as with the Winehouse one) also has a relationship to much older music? What are some of the most blatant rip-offs you've enjoyed?
no subject
Date: 2008-02-19 12:03 pm (UTC)Essence of it was that the original isn't always best and can be quite inconsistent, the copies, however, can take parts of a style and narrow them into something better. However, this does not necessarily apply to copies-of-a-copy Amy spinoffs. Also the industry is unnecessarily obviously cynical about the way they do these things these days.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-19 03:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-19 12:47 pm (UTC)I should clarify what I meant - that when a huge artist hits the record labels start to look for more of the same kind of thing. In terms of what we were talking about I don't think that either Adele of Duffy are Amy Winehouse 'imitations', which is why I was defending them. Yet I'm under no illusions as to how they'll be marketed. If they were just poor Amy rip-offs then of course I'd be critical. But even then, if they were releasing brilliant songs then I wouldn't ultimately care what their origins were.
It's all too easy to forget that Radiohead's first album was dismissed as a poor imitation of Nirvana, that Kylie has long been seen by many as a lesser imitation of Madonna, that Tori Amos to this day is compared to Kate Bush. It's easy to get hung up on these things and lose sight of the work they produce themselves, and that's a shame.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-19 03:17 pm (UTC)RIDE
Date: 2008-02-19 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-19 04:04 pm (UTC)So I guess the answer is, I mind bandwagon-jumping and imitation as long as it seems to be just bandwagon-jumping and imitation; it may take me years to figure out whether it is or isn't; this is sometimes directly proportional to how much I love or hate the original, but really there is no rhyme or reason. Not helpful, sorry.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-19 04:24 pm (UTC)I think it may also depend on how recent what you're copying is - the more distant in time (and therefore less obviously 'commercial') your borrowings are, the less obviously motivated by cashing-in you appear...?
no subject
Date: 2008-02-19 05:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-19 07:31 pm (UTC)I love unreservedly
Date: 2008-02-19 05:26 pm (UTC)Answer Songs:
E.g.,
Work With Me Annie
Roll With Me Henry
Annie Had A Baby
Roxanne Roxanne
Roxanne's Revenge
The Real Roxanne
Roxanne's On A Roll
Roxanne, The Truth Can Be Told (Roxanne Is A Man)
And these weren't answer songs so much as variations on a theme:
Chic "Good Times"
Vaughn Mason & Crew "Bounce Rock Skate Roll"
Trickeration "Rap Bounce Rock Skate"
no subject
Date: 2008-02-19 06:21 pm (UTC)Surely the best blatant rip-off of all time was Brotherhood of Man's "Angelo", for sheer blatancy if nothing else?