Before The Flood
Feb. 12th, 2008 01:37 pmThis is a poll about John Peel's Festive Fifty, 1976. Just tick all the songs you like from the list of 50 (counting down from #50 to #1, as it happens). I've put it up because i) I'm curious about the results, ii) I'm probably writing a pitchfork column about the F50.
[Poll #1137239]
And some more general questions I'd like to think about - they're quite big questions though:
- What does rock do better now? What does it do worse?
- How does the stuff that won respect and adoration on this poll differ from the stuff that critics and fans enjoy now (a VERY broad formulation, I know)?
- Where's the modern equivalent of the audience suggested here - Pazz and Jop? the Pitchfork Readers Poll?
- What were Poco and can we eat them?
[Poll #1137239]
And some more general questions I'd like to think about - they're quite big questions though:
- What does rock do better now? What does it do worse?
- How does the stuff that won respect and adoration on this poll differ from the stuff that critics and fans enjoy now (a VERY broad formulation, I know)?
- Where's the modern equivalent of the audience suggested here - Pazz and Jop? the Pitchfork Readers Poll?
- What were Poco and can we eat them?
no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 02:15 pm (UTC)(Also, loads of this is very good, even if the overall picture it presents is a joke.)
no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 02:24 pm (UTC)I've always loathed John Peel. It started in the Sixties when I was a child, still staggering under the first blow of benediction by black music. All day long on Radio 1 - most of all, on Tony Blackburn's show - you could hear great creamy earfuls of it: Motown by the mile, Philly by the furlong. But at night Radio 1 became a white desert. It became 'intelligent'. That is, it became male, hippy and smelly - it became John Peel.
HEAR FUCKING HEAR.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 02:31 pm (UTC)An understanding that there are different audiences to her has never been a Burchill strength.
One crucial point though is that Peel DIDN'T get to do the canonising or the deciding - the F50 was a listeners poll and he moaned about its contents regularly (did you see the quote I put up from him last week?). He was as much victim as beneficiary of canonising forces - turned into the sainted Godfather Of Indie when there's no evidence he wanted that at all. The canonising process is a lot more subtle and tough to work out than that.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 02:37 pm (UTC)I don't know much about Philly, that quote resonates with me more because I see the same parallel process happening today.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 02:43 pm (UTC)is surely what you mean here!
no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 02:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 02:56 pm (UTC)In a weird way it doesn't feel quite like a living canon though, I don't get a great sense of any of this music dominating the public sphere of rock thought in the way it maybe used to.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-17 06:45 am (UTC)You might be right, but the argument to support this would have to be very subtle and complex, and my guess is that you're not the one who'd be able to make the argument persuasively, given that you don't know the music on this list very well, you don't know the divisions that this list represents - the people voting Beefheart, Richman, and Legendary Stardust Cowboy (!) are not likely voting for much else that's on this list, and they're the ones most likely to be giving scattered votes to the girl groups and Motown and funk and garage rock and bubblegum and glam and Detroit punk (which was very r&b based) that don't register in the results - and you don't know what critics of the time were saying: criticism of course was all over the place in its attitudes but there was a large contingent that would be objecting to this list in much the manner that you do (you have no idea how much you remind me on this thread of Dave Marsh circa 1974, though you're smarter and more engaging and a better writer); in fact this list is much more representative of the rock audience than of rock critics, who were often in conflict with that audience. So the subtle and complex argument would have to be about how people who would be very averse to what they think this list represents and who would plump for very different music nonetheless are something of the latter-day equivalent of the sensibility that produced this list.
In other words, you need to read chapters 12 and 13 of my book. Not that those chapters make the argument I'm envisioning here (which I'm not sure is right anyway), but they're a template one could start with to make such an argument.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-17 09:39 am (UTC)Er, I mean people voting for Richman et al. in 1976, not poptimists voting for them in this poll.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 01:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 02:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 02:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 02:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 03:08 pm (UTC)And what else do you think he could have done - he played the other stuff, hip-hop and house and African music and extreme metal and what have you - all the time! He still liked indie so for him not to play any would have been cutting off his nose to spite his face.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 03:14 pm (UTC)How did Peel's listeners react to him cancelling the chart?
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 02:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 03:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 01:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 03:03 pm (UTC)