[identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists
At the EMP music seminar last year [livejournal.com profile] dubdobdee presented a paper in which he contrasted - or promised to contrast - the "test of time" and the "test of space" when analysing (not just pop) music. I can't remember exactly what the "test of space" is in this schema but ANYWAY I wanted to ask the question (for a P4K column most likely) of why an artform where instancy is apparently such a big element attracts so much 'test of time' rhetoric, and also which OTHER tests one might apply.

Date: 2008-01-16 03:14 pm (UTC)
koganbot: (Default)
From: [personal profile] koganbot
But anyway, claiming "instancy" for popular music is to refuse to examine the motives for and the consequences of one's "instantaneous" musical choices, while invoking the "test of time" is to claim consequence without saying what the consequences are. "Test of time" is like an appeal to authority - such as "science has shown that we like music that we are familiar with from our childhood"; "time has shown that you can't spend a dollar if you don't have it," etc. But as I've been saying, someone's claiming either "instancy" or "test of time" takes place in an overall context that is uncertain of the status of "school" and "criticism."

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 11th, 2026 01:44 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios