[identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists
At the EMP music seminar last year [livejournal.com profile] dubdobdee presented a paper in which he contrasted - or promised to contrast - the "test of time" and the "test of space" when analysing (not just pop) music. I can't remember exactly what the "test of space" is in this schema but ANYWAY I wanted to ask the question (for a P4K column most likely) of why an artform where instancy is apparently such a big element attracts so much 'test of time' rhetoric, and also which OTHER tests one might apply.

Date: 2008-01-16 03:21 pm (UTC)
koganbot: (Default)
From: [personal profile] koganbot
I think you're right that ToT appears often appears as a bet, "we will be listening to this in five years." I remember someone saying in the comments in Pazz & Jop 1999 that none of the current pop would be listened to twenty years hence; and I took this to be not "as opposed to the rock of the present, which will last," but "as opposed to the girl group etc. pop of yore," so it wasn't anti-pop from the point of view of rock but anti-Max from the point-of-view of Phil.

But I still don't hear ToT being invoked that much. But that could be because I'm not hanging around the people doing the invoking.

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 9th, 2026 09:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios