[identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists
Next best thing? "Botherd" says McCormick

Most of this article made me go 'oh, what a load of t0ss', but there's a point lurking about in there somewhere: does an artist need more than one great album in order to become AMAZING? Does an artist even need more than one great song? Does a string of consistently 'very good' albums count for anything if there are no dazzling peaks?

otherwise they will be wasting money

Date: 2008-01-11 03:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blue-russian.livejournal.com
although on one hand i think you're largely right about this, the flipside of the coin is also that with everything so accessible now, it's your time and energy you have to ration. no, it doesn't take that long to find and listen to something new, but it does take a certain amount of discipline to weed through all the noise. at this point, it usually takes repeated mentions, often coming from different places, before I'm motivated to try something completely new (or who have sucky track records).

(One should also note that this article was by someone who is not just anticipating existing acts vs. new ones, but who is expecting that next classic record that Oasis still have in them, not to mention REM and U2.

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 5th, 2026 07:43 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios