The Pop Open Round 3.2 (and 3.1 RESULTS)
Dec. 4th, 2007 11:46 amThis round sees
lockedintheatti and
piratemoggy send their songs into a Robot Wars style ring. Except without house robots (if we did have house robots they would be Daft Punk).
Hear the songs here: http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/12/pop-open-week-151/
And then vote. You have four voting options:
VOTE FOR TRACK THREE
VOTE FOR TRACK FOUR
ABSTAIN IN FAVOUR OF TRACK THREE
ABSTAIN IN FAVOUR OF TRACK FOUR
You can only vote for a track if you've not heard it. An abstain would be used when you know one track but can't bear to give your vote to the other, or when you know BOTH and want to express a preference. Abstains are only counted in the event of a tied vote.
I've used a text box cos it's less obvious who's winning!
[Poll #1100226]
Meanwhile the first person to go through to the finals is
mackromackro, whose track "But" by Kumi Kuma beat the Max'C track
credoimprobus submitted. Well done him and he can start thinking about the WINTER track for the next round.
Next up:
stevem78 vs
byebyepride
Hear the songs here: http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/12/pop-open-week-151/
And then vote. You have four voting options:
VOTE FOR TRACK THREE
VOTE FOR TRACK FOUR
ABSTAIN IN FAVOUR OF TRACK THREE
ABSTAIN IN FAVOUR OF TRACK FOUR
You can only vote for a track if you've not heard it. An abstain would be used when you know one track but can't bear to give your vote to the other, or when you know BOTH and want to express a preference. Abstains are only counted in the event of a tied vote.
I've used a text box cos it's less obvious who's winning!
[Poll #1100226]
Meanwhile the first person to go through to the finals is
Next up:
no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 12:26 pm (UTC)I think I have made a crucial error of judgement in track selection here.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 12:33 pm (UTC)I like your track. Although obviously won't be voting for it!
no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 02:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 03:37 pm (UTC)Fnx for the support to you lot that did vote for me, though!
no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 03:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 07:53 pm (UTC)It seems like this round was more of a "what flavor am I in the mood for NOW?" type of thing. I'm surprised the Kumi Koda track did so well in comparison, but if people were allowed to split multiple points between the two, it would be neck-and-neck, no doubt the score would go into four overtimes!
Again, you guys are insane for letting me get this far. Now to look for landmines and trapdoors.
And msg me if you want to hear a better encoding of "But", web searches failing. (Again, no issues with the Pop Open player on my end for the purpose of judging. People know it compresses a lot.)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 07:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 08:36 pm (UTC)blah blah, anyway!
Round 3.2
Date: 2007-12-04 08:42 pm (UTC)Re: Round 3.2
Date: 2007-12-05 09:09 am (UTC)I liked both tracks, but it didn't take me long to decide on Track Three, which surprised me a bit because of its length. First, I only count it as 4:45 since the final minute or so sounds like a coda or transitional ambience. Second, all 5 minutes are very well used.
I really liked the verse and chorus for Track Four, but alas it didn't really go anywhere beyond the first chorus for me.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-05 05:13 pm (UTC)One word reviews of both tracks:
Track 3: MYSTERIOUS
Track 4: SWANKY