Profile
Poptimists
Page Summary
alexmacpherson.livejournal.com - (no subject)
katstevens.livejournal.com - (no subject)
jeff-worrell.livejournal.com - (no subject)
freakytigger.livejournal.com - (no subject)
katstevens.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nicolars.livejournal.com - (no subject)
awesomewells.livejournal.com - (no subject)
the-roofdog.livejournal.com - it made me think of this what i watched last night:
mostlyconnect.livejournal.com - (no subject)
piratemoggy.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cis.livejournal.com - uh semi-relatedly
andthatisthat.livejournal.com - (no subject)
chezghost.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 12:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 12:10 pm (UTC)I don't get why so much great pop has to have terrible art.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 12:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 12:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 12:07 pm (UTC)SECHSY NURSES
SECHSY ALIENS
CIRCUS/ACROBATS (spangly tights innit)
CAVEGIRLS (think Raquel Welsh in 100000 BC oh my god you know they're REMAKING THIS??)
BOUNTY HUNTERS
etc
no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 12:08 pm (UTC)The Chemistry cover was awful (altho' the cover of the Wobs edition is grebt)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 12:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 12:08 pm (UTC)It is a great deal better than The Sound Of Girls Aloud tho.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 12:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 12:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 12:22 pm (UTC)i guess i just don't see GA as a band you can leave off the cover - unlike Radiohead ;)
it's actually quite a bold, radical move - how many girl pop albums are there without the girl(s) on the cover?
so that's good but the image itself is dull so backfires imo.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 12:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 12:37 pm (UTC)Also this:
no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 12:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 12:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 03:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 01:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 04:35 pm (UTC)also, are you coming out to play on saturday, or are you being a good girl and staying in the back of beyond? :)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-01 01:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-01 01:20 pm (UTC)i promise not to roll my eyes at ppl who don't know what ftb and fsvo mean for the next 6 months :)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-01 03:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-01 04:29 pm (UTC)fsvo: for some values of.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-01 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-01 04:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 12:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 12:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 01:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 01:41 pm (UTC)it made me think of this what i watched last night:
Date: 2007-10-31 01:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 01:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 02:01 pm (UTC)Five minute paint job:
Bad font but otherwise I'm not even sure that's all that much worse than the real one. Still, 'tangled up' is an ace album name!
uh semi-relatedly
Date: 2007-10-31 02:16 pm (UTC)Re: uh semi-relatedly
Date: 2007-10-31 02:19 pm (UTC)Re: uh semi-relatedly
Date: 2007-10-31 06:30 pm (UTC)Re: uh semi-relatedly
Date: 2007-10-31 02:20 pm (UTC)Re: uh semi-relatedly
Date: 2007-10-31 02:33 pm (UTC)Re: uh semi-relatedly
Date: 2007-10-31 02:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-01 01:14 pm (UTC)My biggest problem with it is that it looks like a temporary promo cover while they're still working on the actual one. Except the promo cover for WWTNS? was ace.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-01 04:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-01 04:46 pm (UTC)