i am gradually working up to a GRAND UNIFIED GUESS-MY-THEORY of IRONY i think:
here is the working so far (yes i use NYPLM for my CONFUSING SCRIBBLED NOTES, wot of it?)
A. ironic isn't the word
B. no, it REALLY REALLY isn't
C. bcz it DOESN'T EXIST

interweb plzcomplete correct my homework thxbye
here is the working so far (yes i use NYPLM for my CONFUSING SCRIBBLED NOTES, wot of it?)
A. ironic isn't the word
B. no, it REALLY REALLY isn't
C. bcz it DOESN'T EXIST

interweb plz
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 02:06 pm (UTC)Whot about the Darkness? I think the whole irony element there was massively overplayed, b/c it rested on the very shaky idea that the only way you could find metal funny was from a position of outsider disdain.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 02:17 pm (UTC)ix. because the idea that a cover might "open up" a song is not new but ususally cover wd be "reverential". Is yr idea that "reverential" is meaningless and a "reverential" cover is no different from a non-serious one and yet, perhaps, the so-called non-serious approach draws more from the original? (YSIs for comparison, pls)
x. because, yeah, i have no direct experience of this "old space" and i would be interested to hear how you think it functioned/would function today.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-25 02:18 pm (UTC)