I am *extremely* wary of using the chip/shoulder arg as a way of dismissing people. Just because someone is exhibiting a lot of (quite possibly valid, in this case) resentment doesn't mean there isn't some truth in what they are saying.
Throughout that piece ad hominem attacks on posh people keep popping up in really tenuous places (and constant Burchillesque blowing-own-trumpet boasting about being working class).
i'm in agreement with lex here, it rly is kneejerk "freakytigger and dubdobdee and byebyepride* went to public school = all popists are toffs" isn't it?
*not that i'm calling mark or alex popists, but i'm pretty sure k-punk is
I think it's more like Kogan used a trigger word. Like there were times in my history where someone could be saying whatever they wanted but if they used the words "Liz Phair" I would blog about it. "Class" is the one here.
That's the problem - unless I've totally misread Frank's recent columns, he's been careful to avoid a strict definition of class, at its most specific the word merely describes 'certain stereotypically-viewed groups of people' rather than focusing on 'age' (or middle/lower or public/comprehensive). I understand that k-punk hasn't read all of the columns so perhaps he missed out on this pre-amble.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 01:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 02:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 02:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 02:32 pm (UTC)*not that i'm calling mark or alex popists, but i'm pretty sure k-punk is
no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 02:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 02:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 02:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 10:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 10:05 pm (UTC)