[identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists
Do you appreciate what I'm going to call 'cleverness' - wordplay, allusion, non-standard structures, etc. - in pop music? Is it something you look for? Who does it well?

Do you think there's an opposition between cleverness and directness (in emotional or physical impact)? Should pop be cleverer?

(Qn arising from today's Popular entry)

cleverness zones

Date: 2007-08-13 03:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jauntyalan.livejournal.com
it all depends on your stance with the source of the cleverness dunnit. one man's clever is another man's pretentious. (so far so obvious). also obv - it takes intense clever to be the best kind of simple and direct. but pop's cleverness might be concentrated in the non-musical marketing stuff. in the styling of a band, the 'stance' of the band. costello and the police pretending to be new wave, the spice girls papier-mache feminism, indie bands blathering authenticity, teenpop or emo 'everyman'. the ones that fool most of the people most of the time, that's clever.

Re: cleverness zones

Date: 2007-08-13 07:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alexmacpherson.livejournal.com
I was just thinking that on the bus - so much 'cleverness' is really in the image the act put across. eg 'Overpowered' isn't really too weird a song, but Roisin's known as a kook and wears a strange dress in the video => it is clever-pop rather than Britney-pop.

G Stefani is fertile territory here b/c something like 'Hollaback Girl' is obv on the face of it as dumb as you get but there's a level of self-awareness there which puts Stefani firmly into clever territory (contra (the (entirely inaccurate) public perception) of Fergie Ferg).

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 10th, 2026 07:32 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios