A Year In Pop: 28
Jul. 16th, 2007 11:35 amA light-ish week with a few well-known names.
Last week's poll - http://community.livejournal.com/poptimists/406271.html - got very very low tickage. Now, it wasn't a very inspiring selection but do pop back and have a look at it if only to tick the "not heard" box! The, ahem, delicately calibrated orgafun ranking system is in danger of being thrown out of wack.
[Poll #1022266]
There's another 20 minutes or so to get yr tick on in the Pop Open love vote, too. I have a terrible feeling it might be a draw as it stands.
Last week's poll - http://community.livejournal.com/poptimists/406271.html - got very very low tickage. Now, it wasn't a very inspiring selection but do pop back and have a look at it if only to tick the "not heard" box! The, ahem, delicately calibrated orgafun ranking system is in danger of being thrown out of wack.
[Poll #1022266]
There's another 20 minutes or so to get yr tick on in the Pop Open love vote, too. I have a terrible feeling it might be a draw as it stands.
Re: Good Ticknology
Date: 2007-07-16 11:36 am (UTC)I'm not fully conversant with it myself but I keep getting sent mixes which I presume fall into this category, and I love all of them. I prefer what I assume is termed the "space disco" end - lots of luscious cascading piano, trippy beats, not so many vocals. It's all very loungey, smooth, rather decadent and dreamy. I think a re-edit is less a reworking of a song than...just tightening it up, making it slightly more dancefloor-friendly in tersm of beats and structure. I haven't heard the Frankie Valli original though.
Lindstrom and Prins Thomas are, I think, the key act to check out - I love their stuff. (http://www.ilxor.com/ILX/ThreadSelectedControllerServlet?boardid=41&threadid=49556)
Re: Good Ticknology
Date: 2007-07-16 11:49 am (UTC)I can take 'em or leave disco edits mostly. Few improve on the originals. The Valli one is OK, I spose. I wish the scene's main participants spent more time making their own music cos it's nearly always good, and certainly far more interesting.
Re: Good Ticknology
Date: 2007-07-16 12:47 pm (UTC)If this re-edit is anything to go by, I don't really see the point - I'd like to play the original and this side by side and see what's been done
Re: Good Ticknology
Date: 2007-07-16 01:01 pm (UTC)The Rub'n'Tug Fabric mix is v good!
Re: Good Ticknology
Date: 2007-07-16 03:42 pm (UTC)YES i AM a lazy swine
Re: Good Ticknology
Date: 2007-07-16 05:33 pm (UTC)Re: Good Ticknology
Date: 2007-07-16 07:55 pm (UTC)Re: Good Ticknology
Date: 2007-07-16 08:05 pm (UTC)Re: Good Ticknology
Date: 2007-07-16 05:36 pm (UTC)having said that, over the weekend i did a 're-edit' of 'I Can't Go For That (No Can Do)' so that the intro is extended allowing it's greatness to be savoured to more satisfactory level - hurrah I!