The League Of Pop final has proved interesting logistically in terms of how many votes (as many as the smaller PWC games so far) but especially in terms of the amount of commentary - very minimal, probably because there's a content post and then a vote post and no track reveal and and and where do you actually DISCUSS the stuff? (Especially as all 4 songs are good!)
So last night I came up with a brainwave for the Pop Open. 5 songs in a group, right? So post one of them each day during the week, let it have its moment in the sun, and on the final day put a zipfile up with them all in (for people who can't be botherd with separate downloads) and do the actual vote at the start of the next week. This still leaves a question surrounding reveals but I think it will work, so that'swhat we're going to do one idea that I am vacillating over.
Still on 21 out of 41 btw. The track I really need (to give me a full group to go with next week) is
infov0re's contribution to the SEX group. The VIOLENCE, LOVE, PASSION and DEATH ones are also two away from being complete. MONEY is on 2 out of 5, RELIGION on 1 out of 5 and let us not speak of INJUSTICE.
So last night I came up with a brainwave for the Pop Open. 5 songs in a group, right? So post one of them each day during the week, let it have its moment in the sun, and on the final day put a zipfile up with them all in (for people who can't be botherd with separate downloads) and do the actual vote at the start of the next week. This still leaves a question surrounding reveals but I think it will work, so that's
Still on 21 out of 41 btw. The track I really need (to give me a full group to go with next week) is
no subject
Date: 2007-06-08 10:30 am (UTC)i'm not sure posting one a day will increase commenting/discussion becuase rly, how many ppl will be @rsed/are phsically able to download tracks one at a time? so the majority will wait for the weekend and od it as a lump then (i certainly would anyway)...
no subject
Date: 2007-06-08 10:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-08 10:36 am (UTC)OH I DONT KNOW. It seemed like a grebt idea last night.
How about:
- content and votes in one bloc, and then a reveal a couple days later with a link back to the poll. I think reveals will matter a lot less in this than in the LoP - the element of surprise is fun but less of a determiner of the game.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-08 10:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-08 10:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-08 10:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-08 10:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-08 10:39 am (UTC)I disagree. Let us highlight INJUSTICE wherever it occurs. For instance, why did they let her out early (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6731143.stm)?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-08 11:07 am (UTC)Although obv. it's more likely to be 'WAAAH I DON'T LIKE JAIL'
no subject
Date: 2007-06-08 12:16 pm (UTC)html idiot
Date: 2007-06-08 12:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-08 11:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-08 11:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-08 10:46 am (UTC)I think a link back to the 'reveals' will be fine for spurring along comment. It's hard to chat about something if you're not sure what it is!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-08 11:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-08 12:22 pm (UTC)another idea
Date: 2007-06-08 12:23 pm (UTC)post all the tracks on whatever day. then at specified later interval, an appointed raconteur will write reviews of all tracks (a la League of Pop), and the voting and comments will be in that post. I would suggest having the League of Pop winner do the first Pop Open week, and then the "winner" of each Pop Open week be appointed the raconteur for the following week. (their opinions/votes wouldn't count for more than anyone else's, it would just get things started).
or you could just get volunteers.
Re: another idea
Date: 2007-06-08 12:25 pm (UTC)Plus of course there'll be discussion around the theme and what other people might have submitted etc etc.
We shall see!
Re: another idea
Date: 2007-06-08 01:32 pm (UTC)I thought that, too, but didn't want to impose :)
Re: another idea
Date: 2007-06-09 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-08 01:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-09 04:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-09 11:48 pm (UTC)